Bhairava Charitable Trust® And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
11 December, 2017·2. SHRI MARUTHI INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, TIPPU CIRCLE, GUBBI, TUMUKURU DISTRICT – 572 216 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: GIRISH BANDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTD. BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT & ENTREPRENEURSHI...
High Court Of Karnataka
Vinayak Badavane Nivaasigala And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: H G Ramesh, P S Dinesh Kumar
11 December, 2017·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE OFFICE AT: VAKKALIGARA BHAVAN HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU-560 002 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Aruna L W/O Nemichandra vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
11 December, 2017·3. THE PRINCIPAL, ST. MARY’S POLYTECHNIC, FORT ROAD, K.B.EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA – 577 501. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT: PRAMODINI KISHAN, ADDL. GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED COMM...
High Court Of Karnataka
Indus Steel & Alloy Ltd And Others vs Mr D Venkatesh Gupta And Others
Judges: Aravind Kumar
11 December, 2017·5. MR. VISHWESHWARA ADIGA S/O SIDDALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.112, RLF RESIDENCY BANGALORE-560 076. ...PETITIONERS (BY SMT. CHITRA SAMPATH, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI H.S. RUKKOJI RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. D. VENKATESH GUPTA S/O REDDAPPASETTY AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT NO.461, GROUND FLOOR 21S...
High Court Of Karnataka
Radico Khaitan Limited vs Bt & Fc Private Limited
Judges: B Veerappa
11 December, 2017·PLOT NO.J-1, BLOCK B-1, MOHAN COOPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL AREA, MATHURA ROAD,NEW DELHI-110 044. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SATISH CHANDRA PANDEY ... PETITIONER (BY SMT. NALINA MAYEGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: BT & FC PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT,1956 HAVING I...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ramesh @ Sangli vs The State By Badavanahalli Police
Judges: Ravi Malimath, John Michael Cunha
11 December, 2017·3. In order to prove its case, the prosecution in all examined 9 witnesses as PW-1 to PW-9, documents were marked as Exs.P1 to 21 and the material object had been identified as M.O-1. The accused denied the evidence as false and got examined DW-1 to DW-3 in support of his case and pleaded not gui...
High Court Of Karnataka
Rajivalochana R S vs Registrar And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
11 December, 2017·2. THE PRINCIPAL M.V.J. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING CHANNASANDRA MAIN ROAD, NEAR ITPB, WHITEFIELD, KADUGODI, BENGALURU-560 067. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANTOSH S. NAGARALE, ADV. FOR R-1) ******* THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Tavant Technologies Private Limited A Company And Others vs Electricity Ombudsman & Others
Judges: Vineet Kothari
11 December, 2017·…RESPONDENTS (BY Mr. P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADV., FOR R3 & R4 VIDE ORDER DATED 31/7/2013 NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DT. 24TH JUNE 2013, PASSED BY THE R1 i.e., THE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.