G Raja And Others vs Karnataka State Law University And Others
Judges: H G Ramesh, P S Dinesh Kumar
13 December, 2017·THESE WRIT APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Ag.CJ (Oral): 1. These writ appeals are directed against the order of a learned Single Judge dated 13.11.2017 dismissing the petitions of the appellants in W.P.Nos.49623-49637/2017. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Kushal Raju H B vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
13 December, 2017·2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN – 573 201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAKALESHPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT – 573 134. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SAKALESHPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT – 573 134. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRANKUMAR.T.L., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 22...
High Court Of Karnataka
Vishwabharathi House Building Co Operative Society Ltd vs Bangalore Development Authority T Chowdaiah
Judges: B Veerappa
13 December, 2017·Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd., No.35, Ratnavilas Road Basavanagudi Bangalore – 560 004 Rep by its Secretary Smt.Saraswathi Kesarkar ... PETITIONER (By Sri.K.S.Abhijith for Sri.Sanjeev B.L., Advocates) AND: Bangalore Development Authority T.Chowdaiah Road Kumara Park West Ba...
High Court Of Karnataka
K C Thammayanna vs The Assistant Commissioner And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
13 December, 2017·1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER REVENUE SUB-DIVISION HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN – 573 215 2. THE TAHSILDAR ARSIKERE TALUK ARSIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN – 573 103 3. NANJUNDAPPA S/O SMT.CHIKKAMMA AGE: 45 YEARS 4. SHIVANNA S/O SMT.CHIKKAMMA AGE: 43 YEARS 5. HANUMEGOWDA S/O SMT.CHIKKAMMA AGE: 40 YEARS 6. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri A P Ashok vs The Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd And Others
Judges: Raghvendra S Chauhan
13 December, 2017·3. SRI B. K. NINGAPPA MAJOR, JUNIOR ENGINEER (E), WORKING AT: 66/11 K. V. STATION, KPTCL, DUDDA, (T.L & S.S. DIVISION), KPTCL, HASAN), HASAN-573118. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIKRAM UNNI, ADV. FOR SRI S. SRIRANGA, ADV. FOR R-1 AND R-2; SRI RAGHAVENDRA H. S., ADV. FOR C/R-3) THIS WRIT PE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri N Basavaraj And Others vs The Secretary Department Of And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
13 December, 2017·This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records from the office of the R2 vide Annexure-P and quash Annexure-P dated 24.2.2016 passed by R3 and etc. This Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the follo...
High Court Of Karnataka
The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
13 December, 2017·3. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560060. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR.T.L, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 24.03.2016 PASSED BY THE R-2 I...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M Jayaramaiah
Judges: Raghvendra S Chauhan
13 December, 2017·…PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.B.MUKKANNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: THE CHAIRMAN, BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.RAGHAVENDRA .P. HOGADE ADVOCATE ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISS...
High Court Of Karnataka
Future Market Networks Limited vs Raga Hospitality Private Limited A Company
Judges: A S Bopanna Company
13 December, 2017·REP BY: ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR.ANIL CHERIAN. (BY SRI SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ & SRI SHRAVANTH ARYA, ADVS. FOR M/S. ANUP S SHAH LAW FIRMS) AND: RAGA HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT,1956 HAVING OFFICE AT B4-404, SHRIRAM SPANDANA CHALGATTA, YAMALUR POST BANGALO...
High Court Of Karnataka
W/O Bhagawan G vs Sri V C Yogaiah
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar
13 December, 2017·This R.F.A. coming on for Hearing Interlocutory Application, this day, the Court delivered the following: J U D G M E N T Heard the appellant’s counsel on I.A.1/2013 and also on merits of this appeal. 2. The counsel for the respondent is absent. 3. I.A.1/2013 is filed under Order 22 Rule 10 r/w Se...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.