Basheer Bellare @ D Abdul Basheer vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: Budihal R B
14 December, 2017·THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This is a petition filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 438 IPC seeking anticipatory bail to direct the respondent/police to release the petitioner on b ail in the event of his arrest...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Pavithra @ Sandhya W/O John vs State By Hulimavu Police Station
Judges: Budihal R B
14 December, 2017·THESE CRL.Ps COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Since these two petitions are in respect of same crime number and common questions of facts and law are involved, both are clubbed together, heard and disposed of by this common order, in order to avoid repeti...
High Court Of Karnataka
Siddananjamma W/O Late Narasappa And Others vs L R Homegowda And Others
Judges: L Narayana Swamy Miscellaneous
14 December, 2017·1. SIDDANANJAMMA W/O LATE NARASAPPA AGED 31 YEARS 2. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE NARASAPPA, AGED 26 YEARS 3. RAKESH S/O LATE NARASAPPA, AGED 21 YEARS 4. HARSHITHA D/O LATE NARASAPPA, AGED 7 YEARS, APPELLANT 4 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER 1ST APPELLANT AND ALL ARE R/AT AKKIRAMPURA, HO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Prashanth Prabhu And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: K N Phaneendra
14 December, 2017·2. Petitioners and their counsel are present before the court. The respondent No.2 – defacto complainant and his counsel is also present before the court. The petitioners and respondent No.2 have compromised the matter by filing an application u/s.320(8) of Cr.P.C. for compounding, along with an ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Manjunatha And Others vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
14 December, 2017·ORDER Petitioners 1 & 2 and their counsel are present before the court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent – State. Perused the records. Office objections are over ruled. 3. Petitioner No.1 is accused No.2 and pet...
High Court Of Karnataka
K K Suresh vs Aslam
Judges: K N Phaneendra
14 December, 2017·ORDER Sri H.T. Jagadeesh, learned Advocate files vakalath on behalf of respondent. 2. The petitioner and his counsel, respondent and his counsel are present before the court. Both the parties have filed Joint Memo u/s.147 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Heard the parties and their counsel. Peruse...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri T Khaja Mohinuddin And Others vs The State Of Karnataka & Ors 2/4 National Highways
Judges: Vineet Kothari
14 December, 2017·4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAYS NATIONAL HIGHWAYS SUB-DVN., TUMKUR-572101. 5. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAYS OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR-572101. 6. TUMKUR MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Shivalingamma W/O Sri Venkatesh And Others vs The Principal Secretary & Ors
Judges: Vineet Kothari
14 December, 2017·3. MANDURU GRAM PANCHAYATH MANDURU, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-49 REP. BY THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER. 4. MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE DODDA ANNEPPA AGE MAJOR R/AT. NIMBEKAYIPURA VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-49. 5. RAJANNA S/O LATE DODDA ANNEPPA AG...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.