Smt T N Ahalya And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Urban Development And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
05 December, 2017·2. MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, MYSORE – 570 005. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER . 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ZONE-2 MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, J.L.B. ROAD, MYSORE – 570 001. 4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI LAK...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri G C Shankaramurthy And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: H G Ramesh, P S Dinesh Kumar
05 December, 2017·THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Ag.CJ (Oral): 1. These writ petitions are directed against the order dated 01.03.2017 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore rejecting petitioner...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Savithramma vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
05 December, 2017·3. THE THASILDAR, MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT – 570 001. 4. MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, MYSURU – 570 005. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, MYSURU – 570 005. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Joseph D Cruz vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: H G Ramesh, P S Dinesh Kumar
05 December, 2017·K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 009 4. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK KRISHNARAJAPURAM BENGALURU – 560 036 5. KARNATAKA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD NO.49, “PARISARA BHAWANA” CHURCH STREET BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 6. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MANDOOR VILLAGE PANCHAYAT M...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Fouzia Farookh vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: A S Bopanna
05 December, 2017·1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ... PETITIONER REVENUE DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL CELL) M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANGALORE-575001 3. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Al Haj K Meer vs Smt Hajira W/O Late
Judges: B Veerappa
05 December, 2017·AL-HAJ K MEER ABDUL RAZACK S/O LATE K.MEER ABDUL KHUDDUS, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT 13, GROUND FLOOR, 9TH MAIN ROAD, PILLANNA GARDEN, 3RD STAGE, EXTENSION, BENGALURU – 560 045. ...PETITIONER (By Sri RASHEED KHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.HAJIRA W/O LATE H A MOHAMMED RAHAMATHULLA, AGED ABOUT 60 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt N Rekha D/O Nityanandan vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
05 December, 2017·3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, E-WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 009. 5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMEN...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M Shankara Murthi vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
05 December, 2017·2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE – 570 001. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MYSORE – 570 001. 4. THE COMMISSIONER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MYSORE – 570 001. 5. THE TAHSILDAR MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE, MYSORE DISTRICT – 570 001. ......
High Court Of Karnataka
K B Shivappa vs Smt K D Kamini And Others And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
05 December, 2017·2. The plaintiff had filed suit for specific performance in O.S.No.103/2014 against the defendants to enforce the alleged agreement dated 28.05.1985 said to have been executed by the defendants contending that late Ponnamma and defendant No.1 were the joint own...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Tamura Elcomponics Technologies Pvt Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Labour And Others
Judges: Raghvendra S Chauhan
05 December, 2017·O R D E R M/s. Tamura Elcomponics Technologies Pvt. Ltd., the petitioner, has challenged the legality of the order dated 28.12.2016, whereby the learned Labour Commissioner, the respondent No.1, has granted permission to the Trade Union, the respondent No.2, to initiate prosecution against th...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.