Sri K Thimmaraju And Others vs Siddagangaiah And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
07 December, 2017·6. The trial Court considering the application and objections, by the impugned order dated 09.09.2016, rejected the application filed by the plaintiffs under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure and allowed the application filed by the defendants No.1 to 6 i.e., I.A.Nos.6...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Austin Roach vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
07 December, 2017·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT – 562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L., ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER AR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M Muniyappa vs Doddahonnaiah @ Appajaiah And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
07 December, 2017·7. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.8 under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure to refer the sale agreement dated 23.01.2012 at Annexure-A to the District Registrar for adjudication of duty and penalty or return the sale agreement to enable him to get adjudicate the stamp ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri K Thimmaraju And Others vs Siddagangaiah And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
07 December, 2017·6. The trial Court considering the application and objections, by the impugned order dated 09.09.2016, rejected the application filed by the plaintiffs under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure and allowed the application filed by the defendants No.1 to 6 i.e., I.A.Nos.6...
High Court Of Karnataka
Vishwanath K vs E
Judges: Vineet Kothari
07 December, 2017·... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 20.09.2017 PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, D.K. AT MANGALURU IN DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR NON-ADDRESSING OF THE ARGUMENTS IN M.A.NO.51/2012 VIDE ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Vijaya Kumar vs The State Of Karnataka Through Its Principal Secretary And Others
Judges: B V Nagarathna
07 December, 2017·(a) Preliminary Examination- The Preliminary Examination shall be conducted by way of Objective Type Question Paper with multiple choices of 1½ hours (Ninety minutes) duration consisting of 100 marks. The syllabi for the said examination shall be the following, namely.- Part A Civil Law. Part B Cr...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri K P Nanjundi vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
07 December, 2017·THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHANNAPATNA POLICE STATION CHANNAPATNA TOWN RAMANAGARA DISTIRCT ... RESPONDENT [By Sri S Rachaiah, HCGP] THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO 152/2012 FILED BY TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Sanaulla vs State Of Karnataka Through Station And Others
Judges: K N Phaneendra
07 December, 2017·O R D E R The first respondent-police have lodged a charge sheet against the petitioner herein and another person for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [for short, ITP Act] read with Section 370 IPC, in CC No 25007 of 2016 and af...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M K Anand Kumar vs Sri Shivakumar And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
07 December, 2017·7. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.9 under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure to refer the sale agreement dated 23.01.2012 at Annexure-A to the District Registrar for adjudication of duty and penalty or return the sale agreement to enable him to get adjudicate the stamp ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.