Anuj Kumar Misra @ Chhotey Bhaiya vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Manish Kumar
27 July, 2021·It is further submitted that there is no evidence on record to show that the victim/prosecutrix is suffering from any mental or physical disability. It is further submitted that for asserting the fact that the victim is suffering from mental disability, the matter has been referred to the Physiatric...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yasheen vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy. Home Lko. ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
27 July, 2021·Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned notice dated 30.04.2021 has been issued to the petitioner only on the basis of two F.I.Rs. which were lodged against the petitioner bearing Case Crime No. 239 of 2015, under Section 60 of the Excise Act and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 272 I.P...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sagar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
27 July, 2021·5. However, a perusal of the order dated 23.12.2018 would indicate that outsourcing is one of the grounds on which the case of the petitioner has been rejected, the other ground being that there was no prior approval to the appointment of the petitioner on a Class IV post. 6. Admittedly, the petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Noor Ahmad vs Qazi Zafar Ahmad And Another
Judges: J J Munir
27 July, 2021·The courts below have refused the petitioner's application for impleadment on the ground that suit is one instituted for eviction based on a landlord-tenant relationship, where a third party cannot be permitted to be impleaded. This Court has perused the impugned orders and the materials on record. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashwin Giriraj Agrawal vs State Of ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
27 July, 2021·It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was tried in two cases, namely, Complaint Case Nos.158 of 2015 and 3196 of 2015 for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act (in short, 'the Act') and vide order dated 23.11.2017, passed by Chief Judici...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Niranjan Prasad And Anr. vs State Of U.P. Prin.Secy. Home And ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
27 July, 2021·The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, to quash the First Information Report dated 12.06.2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Ghazipur, District Lucknow, with a further prayer of no coercive action against the petitioners during the pendency of the in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P.Throu.Collector ... vs Jai Singh And Another
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Dinesh Kumar Singh
27 July, 2021·As per the factual matrix of the case, the respondent-Jai Singh, resident of Village Maroofpur, Post Mohammadpur, Tehsil Haidergarh, District Barabanki possessed certain land and for the purpose of cultivation thereof and others decided to purchase a tractor. He looked towards Union Bank of India Br...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anshad Badarudheen Thru. Brother ... vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Internal ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Ajai Kumar Srivastava I
27 July, 2021·"19. We cannot ignore that it is a well-settled canon of interpretation that when it comes to construction of a section, it is to be read in its entirety, and its sub-sections are to be read in relation to each other, and not disjunctively. Besides, the text of a section has to be read in the contex...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saleem @ Kuddu vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Suresh Kumar Gupta
27 July, 2021·Learned A.G.A. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is no illegality in the impugned order, hence the applicant is not entitled for bail and the bail application is liable to be rejected. After hearing the rival submissions of the parties, and perused the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kumari Neetu And Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
27 July, 2021·It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and have married with each other out of their own free will on 05.07.2021. The age of petitioner no.1- Kumari Neetu is about 26 years as per High School Marksheet contained in Annexure No.4 to the writ ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.