Suraj (Minor) Through His Father ... vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: Saroj Yadav
28 July, 2021·8. As far as parity is concerned as pleaded by the learned counsel for the revisionist, that is not available to the revisionist because the role of those persons are not similar to the revisionist. No allegation regarding rape has been made against them as the order and the statement of the victim ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Misra vs Addl. District Judge Court No. 8 ...
Judges: Attau Rahman Masoodi
28 July, 2021·By means of the impugned order passed by the revisional court on 19.03.2021, the amendment application filed by the petitioner/revisionist before the revisional court below in SCC Revision No.3 of 2017 i.e. 20-Ga has partly been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an appl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laxman Das Wadhawa vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Mohd Faiz Khan
28 July, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.4 jointly submits that an FIR was lodged by the opposite party no.4 against the applicant and after the submission of charge sheet cognizance was taken by the Magistrate and summons were also issued. However, the part...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajaipal Lohar vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
28 July, 2021·Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the prayer for bail but has not contradicted the aforesaid facts as stated by learned counsel for the applicant. Taking into consideration the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment as well as the fact that charge sheet has been filed a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sadiq Hussain @ Waqil (Second ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rekha Dikshit
28 July, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant submits that accused applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the first information report was lodged with an inordinate delay of one month without giving any plausible explanation. It is also submitted that the medical...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudheer @ Sudheer Kumar Kannaujia ... vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Saroj Yadav
28 July, 2021·5. Learned counsel for the revisionist/juvenile submitted that the revisionist was not named in the F.I.R. He has been implicated on the basis of the confessional statement of co-offender Sheetal Singh @ Chahat Singh. There is no eye witness of the incident. He further submitted that co-offender She...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Ajay Kumar Bharti vs State Of U.P.Thru Addl.Chief ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
28 July, 2021·The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner qualified for MBBS from Baba Raghav Das Medical College, Gorakhpur in the year 2017. The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (in short UPPSC) opened the vacancy for Medical Officer in the year 2019 thereby the petitioner...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Singh vs Presiding Officer Debt Recovery ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
28 July, 2021·4. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22.10.2008 passed by the Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal. 5. It is the case of the petitioner that he had taken the loan of Rs.15 lakhs from Bank of Maharashtra in the year 2005 and started construction of building, but he suffere...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Puneet Ray @ Karan (Minor) Thru. ... vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Saroj Yadav
28 July, 2021·7. Considered the rival submissions and perused the record. 8. Perusal of the record shows that the revisionist was declared juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board. His age was found 15 years, 4 months and 22 days at the time of incident i.e. below 16 years. There is nothing adverse in the report of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepak Gupta @ Nanhku vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Rekha Dikshit
28 July, 2021·Learned counsel for appellant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the impugned order of the court below is illegal and perverse. The court below has not appreciated the evidence available on record in proper perspective. It is further submitted that no offence under the aforesaid section ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.