Tauseef @ Shera vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Singh
22 January, 2021·Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the applicant is a member of gang and habitual of committing crime. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar anti-social activities and will misuse the bail by extending threat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munendra Kumar Srivastav vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Alok Mathur
22 January, 2021·5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is in jail since 28.11.2020 and further that he is on bail in all the cases shown against him in the Gang Chart. He next submits that the applicant undertakes that he will not indulge in any criminal activity or misuse the liber...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neeraj Kumar Jogi vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Rajiv Gupta
22 January, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that applicant is in jail since 26.9.2020 and has no criminal history to his credit and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Aditya Food Grain Industry ... vs Assistant General Manager Bank Of ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
22 January, 2021·"(a) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opposite Party No.1 and 2 to allow the Petitioner to make repayment of loan amount as settled vide letter dated 09.09.2019 (Contained as Annexure No.1 to the Writ Petition) under one time settlement in four equal instal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Yogita Garg vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
22 January, 2021·The matter requires consideration. Learned Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondents 1, 3 and 4 and Sri B.K. Yadav has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.4. They pray for and are allowed three weeks time to file counter-affidavit. Two weeks, thereafter, shall be for the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Kailash Chandra Laohani And ... vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
22 January, 2021·"For the aforesaid reasons, we find that the petitioner has rendered qualifying pensionary service with effect from the date of his joining in the State Government on his option, and which shall be treated as service qualifying for pension and for which under the Government Orders, by which the hosp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Singh @ Vickky And 8 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Raj Beer Singh
22 January, 2021·Learned counsel for the complainant/opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
22 January, 2021·It is admitted position that the petitioner is under suspension w.e.f. 06.09.2018. In the case of Anshu Bharti vs. State of U.P. and others, reported at 2009(1) AWC 691, it has held that the prolonged suspension of the petitioner is clearly unjust and unwarranted. The question deals with the prolong...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nayeem Ansari @ Naheem Ansari vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Raj Beer Singh
22 January, 2021·Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of evidence, period of custody and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that a case for bail is made out. Henc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohini Rani And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Rajiv Joshi
22 January, 2021·In support of their age, the petitioner no. 1 as well as petitioner no. 2 has brought on record their High School Marks Sheets, wherein the date of birth of the petitioner no. 1 is shown as 01.01.1999 and that of petitioner no. 2 as 07.07.1993. Thus, it appears from the record that both the petition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.