Swati vs State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Basic ...
Judges: Manish Mathur
06 January, 2021·"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no.4 decide the representation given the O.P. No.4 consider the judgment passed by Hon'ble High Court a true photo copy of order dated 10.07.2019 passed by O.P. No.4 and representation dated 09.10.2019 gi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suleman @ Sonu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ali Zamin
06 January, 2021·Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and submits that the applicant has committed the alleged offence, therefore, he is not entitled for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, nature...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopal <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a5978637c6b797e6b7c6b4a">[email protected]</a> Chotu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rahul Chaturvedi
06 January, 2021·Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neeraj Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Mohd Faiz Khan
06 January, 2021·3. We have considered the stand of learned counsel for the State. In Arnesh Kumar's case(supra) the following(relevant portion) has been held:- "9. Another provision i.e. Section 41A Cr.PC aimed to avoid unnecessary arrest or threat of arrest looming large on accused requires to be vitalised. Sectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Kumar @ Kandhai Lal & Ors. vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Alok Mathur
06 January, 2021·5. It has been submitted that the dispute amongst the parties was extremely trivial and does not effect the public at large, and would only amount to private dispute between parties. 6. In State of Karnataka Vs. L. Miniswamy and others,, 1977 (2) SCC 699, a three- Judge Bench of this Court referred ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Birendra Kumar Pandey vs State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Manish Mathur
06 January, 2021·"18. It is not possible to postulate all situations of hardship, which would govern employees on the issue of recovery, where payments have mistakenly been made by the employer, in excess of their entitlement. Be that as it may, based on the decisions referred to herein above, we may, as a ready ref...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Swapnila Sharma vs State Of U.P.Thru Prin. Secretary ...
Judges: Rajnish Kumar
06 January, 2021·3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was no prescribed format provided with the application form or brochure and the petitioner had submitted the certificate issued by the Director Engineer -in Chief Integrated Branch in support of his candidature. 4. Learned Counsel for...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kumari Monika vs U.O.I.Thru Secy.Communication ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
06 January, 2021·Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the existence of alternative statutory remedy. However, he submits that this court may hear the present writ petition as there is no bar for hearing the writ petition inspite of alternative remedy available to him. Learned counsel for the petitione...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cosmos Infraestate Pvt Ltd And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
05 January, 2021·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the validity of order dated 0...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Abound Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
05 January, 2021·Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankita Singhal,Siddharth Singhal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Heard Shri Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.