Shashi Pandey vs State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: Alok Mathur
06 January, 2021·4. Learned counsel for applicant is permitted to make necessary amendment in the memo of petition forthwith. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 6.1.2021 Ravi/ Court No. - 29 Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 1697 of 2020 Applicant :- Shashi Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through S.P.C.B.I./A.C.B., ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shalini Upadhyay And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Rajiv Joshi
06 January, 2021·The petitioners have averred in the writ petition that they are living as wife and husband. It is stated that they have apprehension that private respondent can eliminate them for the honour of his family. In case this Court does not grant them protection, their lives may be endangered. Heard learne...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kunware Chauhan & 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
06 January, 2021·Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but not disputed the aforesaid facts. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the long incarceration of the accused-applicants without trial for a trivial offence, it would be appropriate to enlarge the accused-applicants on bail. Le...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhaggan @ Ramanand Sahni vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Raj Beer Singh
06 January, 2021·Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of evidence, period of custody and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that a case for bail is made out. Henc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajmani vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Jaspreet Singh
06 January, 2021·By means of the instant petition the petitioner prays that his suit under Section 229 B of the U.P. Zamidari Abolition and Land Reforms Act pending before the opposite party no.2 be decided expeditiously. In paragraph 3 of the petition it has been specifically averred that the suit was filed on 12.0...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Kumar Pandey vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy.Home Lko. ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Mohd Faiz Khan
06 January, 2021·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shailesh Soni vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Mohd Faiz Khan
06 January, 2021·3. We have considered the stand of learned counsel for the State. In Arnesh Kumar's case(supra) the following(relevant portion) has been held:- "9. Another provision i.e. Section 41A Cr.PC aimed to avoid unnecessary arrest or threat of arrest looming large on accused requires to be vitalised. Sectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amarej Yadav And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Judges: Arvind Kumar Mishra I
06 January, 2021·(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to direct the respondent no.4 to permit the petitioners for applying in the next Semester i.e. Second Semester for the Academic Year 2020-21 of Bachelor of Education Course recognized by the respondent no.4. (iii) issue any s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S B.D.V.K. Polymers vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Judges: Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
06 January, 2021·It is stated that pursuant to the show cause notice issued by the respondents, reply was given by the petitioner on 26.03.2019. Ignoring the reply, the impugned order dated 26.04.2019 was passed with consequential order of recovery. The non-consideration of the reply violates the basic principle of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar vs M/S Daimler Financial Service ...
Judges: Naheed Ara Moonis, Dinesh Pathak
06 January, 2021·"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the vehicle of the petitioner as Truck No.U.P. 51 AT/5196. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.