M/S Digitronix Infosys Thru Sole ... vs State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Manish Kumar
27 January, 2021·Under challenge in this petition is an order dated 02-12-2020 passed by the Managing Director, U.P. Electronics Corporation Limited, Lucknow (hereinafter referred as Electronics Corporation), whereby the petitioner-firm has been blacklisted, with a further direction that decision to black list the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaypal Kashyap vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Ram Krishna Gautam
27 January, 2021·Having heard learned counsel for both sides and gone through materials on record, it is apparent that prosecutrix was said to be of 17 years in first information report and this report was got lodged with a considerable delay on 6.6.2020. Prosecutrix in her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has sa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijendra Bahadur vs State Of U.P. Thru Secretary ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
27 January, 2021·Counter affidavit on behalf of the State was filed on 24.8.2020 but the same is not on record. Counter affidavit has been supplied by learned Standing Counsel, which is taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel vehemently opposed the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kalimuddin @ Chhotu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Karunesh Singh Pawar
27 January, 2021·Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the partie...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Irfan @ Arbaz Siddqui vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Singh
27 January, 2021·Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the applicant is a member of gang and habitual of committing crime. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar anti-social activities and will misuse the bail by extending threat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neetu @ Dhirendra vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Neeraj Tiwari
27 January, 2021·Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Neetu @ Dhirendra, involved in Case Crime No. 185 of 2020, under Section- 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Preven...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Puneet Kumar Pandey Alias Rupak ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
27 January, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Further submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that charge-sheet in the present case has already been filed. Further submission is that applicant was not named in the F.I.R. an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishambhar @ Vishambar Singh vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Vivek Kumar Singh
27 January, 2021·Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarju Dhanuk vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Alok Mathur
27 January, 2021·4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the search was not conducted as per the provisions of Section 100 Cr.P.C. It is clear from the recovery memo dated 29.8.2020 that as per subsection 4 of Section of Section 100 Cr.P.C. the search was not made in presence of independent witness. Learne...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mantasha Noori And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Vivek Kumar Birla
27 January, 2021·In support of their age, petitioner no. 1 brought on record her High School Marksheet, wherein the date of birth of is shown to be 20.3.2002 and that of petitioner No.2 brought on record his AADHAR Card, wherein date of birth is shown as 17.9.1998. Thus, it appears from the record that both the peti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.