Mukul Agrawal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vivek Agarwal
08 January, 2021·Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J. Sri M.B. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Girish Vishwakarma, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no. 2, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Rampur be directed to mark the boundaries of the petit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Liladhar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Arvind Kumar Mishra I
08 January, 2021·Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to decide Case No.C201601001217 of 2016, Radhey Shyam and another Vs. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Kalawati Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vivek Agarwal
08 January, 2021·Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J. Sri R.C. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Girish Vishwakarma, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no. 2, Naib Tehsildar, Nagar, Tehsil Sadar, District Azmagarh be directed to decide Mutation Case No. T20...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikram And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vivek Agarwal
08 January, 2021·Sri Sanjay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Girish Vishwakarma, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no. 3, Chief Revenue Officer, District Deoria be directed to decide Case No. 534 of 2011-12, Computer Case No. D201205200...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bahraichi vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Arvind Kumar Mishra I
08 January, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27045 of 2020 Petitioner :- Bahraichi Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Keshawa Prasad Pandey,Krishna Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of the instant pe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Soniya And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
08 January, 2021·The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said reason, the private respondent and his other family members have got annoyed and there is serious danger to the lives of the petitioners as they are being threatened and harassed....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar vs Tehsildar
Judges: Vivek Agarwal
08 January, 2021·Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J. Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Girish Vishwakarma, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no. Tehsildar, Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur be directed to decide the Case No. 02443/2020 (Com...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Navneet Baranwal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
08 January, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27205 of 2020 Petitioner :- Navneet Baranwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Barnwal,Suresh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. After arguing the matter at length, Sri Suresh Kumar Gupta, learne...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Shainda Bi Alias Soni And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
08 January, 2021·The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty. The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dudhnath vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Arvind Kumar Mishra I
08 January, 2021·Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to decide proceeding under Section 38 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, exped...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.