Sarvesh Kumar Jaiswal & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Saroj Yadav
13 January, 2021·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offences allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'ble ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanpur Tempo Auto Malik Evam ... vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sanjay Kumar Pachori
13 January, 2021·From the document filed by the petitioner himself being information given to it under the RTI Act (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) also indicates that at certain places facilities are provided and at certain places it is in the process of being provided. We have to also consider that by the adverti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. And 2 Others vs M/S Ashish Kumar Sharma Kila Gate ...
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
13 January, 2021·Undisputedly, the award of the arbitrator is of date 18.06.2019 and it was corrected on 8.7.2019. It's signed copy is admitted to have been provided to the learned counsel for the appellant on 8.7.2019 itself. Therefore, the normal period of limitation to file objection under Section 34 of the Act b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prabhu Dayal Chauhan vs State Of Up Thru Addl.Chief ...
Judges: Rajan Roy, Saurabh Lavania
13 January, 2021·It is not in dispute that today the term of the petitioner is expiring. However, the order was passed on 24.11.2020 and this petition was filed on 09.12.2020 and learned Counsel for the petitioner presses for an adjudication on the validity of impugned action as it can have consequences for the peti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Golu Singh Bhadauria @ Jaideep vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Ram Krishna Gautam
13 January, 2021·Learned counsel for accused-applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number because of refusal of marriage with prosecutrix. He is languishing in Jail since 29.5.2020; accused-applicant is of no criminal antecedent; there is no l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sharad Shukla @ Banti vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ajit Singh
13 January, 2021·The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A. However, the aforesaid factual aspect of the matter has not been disputed by him. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jogindra @ Tina vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Neeraj Tiwari
13 January, 2021·Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Jogindra @ Tina, involved in Case Crime No. 293 of 2020, under Sections- 136 of Electricity Act and section 411 I.P.C., Police Sta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jogindra @ Tina vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Neeraj Tiwari
13 January, 2021·Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Jogindra @ Tina, involved in Case Crime No. 296 of 2020, under Sections- 136 of electricity Act and section 411 I.P.C., Police Sta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ranjit @ Gudda vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Siddharth
13 January, 2021·According to the gang chart the applicant is said to has been involved in eight criminal cases wherein he is on bail. The applicant alleges false implication in the present case due to police rivalry. The applicant has criminalhistory of 10 more cases which have been explained inaffidavit in support...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bankey @ Sobaran Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Judges: Bachchoo Lal, Subhash Chandra Sharma
13 January, 2021·The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the F.I.R. dated 30.6.2020 registered as Case Crime No.269 of 2020, under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 504 I.P.C and section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, police station Iglas, District Aligarh. With a further ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.