Chhotkan @ Chhotkanne vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
17 February, 2021·Counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit have already been exchanged between the parties appearing in the case. The first information report is specifically named against one Shankar, who is neighbour of complainant-father. Allegedly on 26.08.2019, the daughter (victim) of the complainant at about ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Manju Baghel And 2 Others vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Siddharth
17 February, 2021·Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sajjad Alam @ Shahjad Alam @ Bhaiya vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rekha Dikshit
17 February, 2021·Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the natu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dalel @ Dalveer vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Vivek Kumar Singh
17 February, 2021·Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sabu @ Kalu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ajit Singh
17 February, 2021·The first information report was lodged by the complainant against unknown person, alleging therein that on 28/29.7.2020 at about 1:40 a.m. when he was going to his duty on his motorcycle, three motorcycle borne miscreants intercepted him and when he fell down on the ground, the alleged miscreants h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Kanti Prasad Mittal vs Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission ...
Judges: Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
17 February, 2021·We have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. Perusal of Letter of Intent and even pleadings of the writ petition shows that agreement between the parties was not only for supply of material but even erection work. The component of civil work w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prabhat Kumar & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Narendra Kumar Johari
17 February, 2021·11. In the case of B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and others the Hon'ble Supreme Court by discussing earlier decision has discussed the principles of ends of justice particularly in contexts with matrimonial dispute. Relevant paras of the judgment is reproduced below:- "12) The special f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rama Shankar vs Om Prakash And 4 Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
17 February, 2021·i) Set aside and quash order dated 18.12.2020 passed by Addl. District Judge-IV, Banda in Civil Appeal No.62 of 2011 (Mahesh Prasad Versus Ram Deen and others (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition) and allow amendment application 55KA. ii) Pass any other further relief which this Hon'ble Court may dee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Yaseen Khamani And 3 ... vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Siddharth
17 February, 2021·In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that applicant no. 1, Mohammad Yaseen Khamani, will produce the girl, Tarannum, before the C.J.M., concerned, within a period of three weeks. The C.J.M. concerned will get her medical examination conducted for the purpose of age dete...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Arbaz @ Raj(Minor) Thru. ... vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Alok Mathur
17 February, 2021·5. Learned Additional Government Advocate has received instructions as well as statements of the prosecutrix recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. The prosecutrix in her statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. has stated that she was taken to the house of the applicant but has denied that she was ever sexua...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.