Ram Naresh vs Addl.Commissioner(Administration)-Ii ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
18 February, 2021·5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon paragraphs 31, 34 and 38 of the said judgment, which are being quoted hereinbelow:- "31. The mutation proceedings in respect of agricultural land which are presently governed by the provisions of Sections 34 and 35 of the U.P. Revenue Co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Prakash @ Baua vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
18 February, 2021·As per the FIR version, contraband substance (Ganja) weighing about 1 kg 300 gms had been shown to be recovered from the possession of the present applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present FIR showing him as an accused un...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaidul Bahav Beg vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ajit Singh
18 February, 2021·The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in solitary case mentioned against him in the gang chart. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of the offence, evidence, complici...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Usman @ Kallu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ali Zamin
18 February, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. After two months in a police encounter case applicant was arrested and on the basis false recovery of a mobile from the joint possession of three accused, he has been implicated in the case. There is no possibili...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishnu <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e7ac928a8695a7">[email protected]</a> Vishnu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ali Zamin
18 February, 2021·Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the factual aspects. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, complicity of the accused, without expressing any opinion on meri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satyendra Bharti vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Narendra Kumar Johari
18 February, 2021·10. In the case of B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and others the Hon'ble Supreme Court by discussing earlier decision has discussed the principles of ends of justice particularly in contexts with matrimonial dispute. Relevant paras of the judgment is reproduced below:- "12) The special f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munish Ahmad & Another vs State Of U.P. Thru. Home. Secy. Lko ...
Judges: Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
18 February, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the F.I.R. in the instant case has been filed on the basis of false and baseless information given by opposite party no.2 and no offence as stated in the F.I.R. has been committed by the applicants. It is further submitted that the Investigating Office...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satyam Verma @ Avnish Verma vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
18 February, 2021·3. It is alleged that the accused-applicant and his mother had beaten the complainant and molested complainant's daughter. Allegation in the FIR appears to be palpably exaggerated. The accused-applicant has been in jail since 09.12.2020. There is no criminal history of the accused-applicant. 4. Cons...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shikha Chaurasiya And ... vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Judges: Rajiv Joshi
18 February, 2021·In support of their age, the petitioner no.1 & 2 have brought on record their High School Marksheets, wherein the date of birth of the petitioner no.1 is shown as 08.12.2001 and that of petitioner no. 2 as 07.09.1996. Thus, it appears from the record that both the petitioners are major. They have al...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anmol Rastogi vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rahul Chaturvedi
18 February, 2021·Contention raised by the counsel that within three years of marriage on account of additional dowry. The deceased was administered some poisonous substance by which she lost her life. Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn the attention of the Court to the Annexure-8 i.e. statement of of Dr. Ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.