Sangeeta @ Reena vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Neeraj Tiwari
09 February, 2021·Considering the material on record as well as the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Sange...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lallan @ Jhalla vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rakesh Srivastava
09 February, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel contends that the applicant is not named in the FIR; that he has been implicated on the basis of the statement made by the complainant under Section 161 CrPC; that there is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gramya Vikas Evam Samaj Sewa ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Manish Kumar
09 February, 2021·"We have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. No justification could be put forward by the learned Standing Counsel to justify the blacklisting of the petitioners' NGO merely the CBI enquiry being pending cannot be a reason for blacklisting. In our considered view, alth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girijesh Kumar Pandey & Another vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Rajeev Singh
09 February, 2021·Heard Shri H.G.S. Parihar, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Meenakshi Singh Parihar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record. The present writ petitions have been filed by the petit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surya Pratap Singh @ Niraj Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secretary ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Rajeev Singh
09 February, 2021·The petition has been filed by the petitioner for following the main relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to transfer the investigation of the four FIRs bearing No.0494 of 2020, 439 of 2020, 492 of 2020 and 503 of 2020 registered at the Polic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babulley vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra, Shekhar Kumar Yadav
09 February, 2021·12. There is however one inconsistency in the statement of P.W.-2 as regards the prosecution case. The prosecution case is that the deceased and the first informant were proceeding towards their field on foot. However, P.W.-2 in his cross-examination stated that the deceased Vijay Shanker was on a b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jitendra Katiyar vs State Of U.P.Thru.Addl.Chief ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Rajeev Singh
09 February, 2021·6. Considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties, we find that the learned Additional Government Advocate and learned counsel for the C.B.I. failed to fortify their arguments as the impugned sanction order does not reflect so and it is also evident that the Central Vigilance Commissio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tejpal @ Kanhaiya And Another vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Neeraj Tiwari
09 February, 2021·Considering the material on record as well as the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Tejpa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satish Chandra Upadhay vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Raj Beer Singh
09 February, 2021·Learned counsel for the complainant/opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Reena Maan vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Raj Beer Singh
09 February, 2021·It has been argued by learned counsel for revisionist that revisionist has moved an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for registration of F.I.R. against the opposite party nos. 2 but the prayer for investigation by police has been declined in an arbitrary manner. It was submitted that allega...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.