Anil Kumar Agrawal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4646 of 2014 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Agrawal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Khare,Siddharth Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner does not want to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Singh Rajpoot vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. From perusal of record and prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that cause of action does not survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file recal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Kant Dwivedi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. From perusal of record and prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that cause of action does not survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file recal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kali Charan And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. From perusal of record and prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that cause of action does not survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file recal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Pal Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Krishna Kumari And Others vs State Of U P Thru Secy And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22909 of 2008 Petitioner :- Smt. Krishna Kumari And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durga Prasad,G.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. The matter is listed under the heading of 'Likely to be I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhupendra Pal Singh vs State Of U P Thru Principal Secy And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27830 of 2008 Petitioner :- Bhupendra Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Budhwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. From perusal of record and prayer made in the writ petition, it appe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Pal Singh Rathi vs State Of U P Thru Principal Secy And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27832 of 2008 Petitioner :- Om Pal Singh Rathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Budhwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. From perusal of record and prayer made in the writ petition, it appea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Chander Ram vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunder Pal Singh vs State Of U P Thru Principal Secy And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27831 of 2008 Petitioner :- Sunder Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Budhwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. From perusal of record and prayer made in the writ petition, it appears...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.