Smt. Shail Singh vs State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Bal ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
28 November, 2019·By means of this petition the petitioner has assailed the suspension order dated 4.10.2019 passed by the Director, Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pushtahar, U.P., Lucknow. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that mechanical suspension order has been issued by the authority without verifying th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Badhai vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rajeev Singh
28 November, 2019·The submissions of learned counsel for the applicant are that the applicant is innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case, he is having no previous criminal history and in jail since 17.08.2019. It is further submitted on behalf of applicant that the FIR was lodged on 13.08.2019 aga...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijnandan & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Virendra Kumar Ii
28 November, 2019·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Padm Nabh Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Virendra Kumar Ii
28 November, 2019·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Scooters India Ltd. Thru Chief ... vs Presiding Officer,Labour ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
28 November, 2019·3. Sri Suresh Chandra Mishra, learned Counsel for the respondent, has filed the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 i.e. Workman and the Union. The same is taken on record. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis of annexure-13 to the petition, w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sumer Yadav And 11 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
28 November, 2019·"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to grant pension to the petitioners, after counting the services rendered by the petitioners in work charge establishment as qualifying service for the purposes of grant of pension, in terms of judgment an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Banshi Dhar Chandola And 11 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Addl.Chief ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
28 November, 2019·"i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the provisions contained in Regulation 370 of the Civil Service Regulations so far as it provides for non inclusion of services rendered in work charge establishment for the purposes of qualifying service for pension as unconsti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamlesh And Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru ...
Judges: Jaspreet Singh
28 November, 2019·The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the instant revision which was preferred before the opposite party no. 2 was not maintainable, inasmuch as, it was the second revision preferred by the opposite party no. 4 and despite having raised an objection the same has not been consi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Nath vs Additional Sessions Judge, Court ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
28 November, 2019·2. Learned counsel for the accused-revisionist submits that the accused-revisionist has not been convicted previously for any offence and he is the first time offender. The learned counsel at the outset submits that he is not challenging the impugned order, confirming the order passed by the trial C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fauziya Siddiqui vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
28 November, 2019·7. Having heard learned counsel for the contesting parties and having perused the records, what comes out is that the respondents have proceeded to reject the claim of the petitioner for being appointed on compassionate ground solely on the ground that the Government Order dated 04.09.2000 does not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.