Priya Singh @ Gudiya vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Mohd Faiz Khan
26 July, 2019·In Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra MANU/SC/0089/1971 : (1971) 2 SCC 654, it was held that the process of taking cognizance does not involve any formal action, but it occurs as soon as the Magistrate applies his mind to the allegations and thereafter takes judicial notice of the offe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anjani Kumar @ Girindra Kumar vs Ram Bux Singh S/O Shitla Singh
Judges: Rajnish Kumar
26 July, 2019·5. He further submitted that the learned Tribunal has wrongly and illegally discarded the medical expenses and the bill vouchers of Rs.1,41,500/- on the ground that the medical prescriptions have not been filed in support thereof while all the medicines were purchased during course of his treatment ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radicon Infrastructure And ... vs Dhaneshwari Devi Dhyani
Judges: Rajan Roy
26 July, 2019·On the other hand Dr. Azhar Ikram, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 contends that this issue has already been decided by a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 17.09.2018 passed in Writ- C No. 31085 of 2018; M/s Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and Ors., where...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amit Singh Rajpoot vs Smt. Sarita Singh
Judges: Anil Kumar, Saurabh Lavania
26 July, 2019·" ???? ?????? ???????? ??? ??????? ????? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ?? | ???? ??? ??????????? ?? ???? ????? ????????? ? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ?? | ????? ???? ????????? ???? -???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? ??????, ?????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?????? | ?????????? ?????? ????? ?? ?...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanker Shahi vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Shashi Kant Gupta, Pankaj Bhatia
26 July, 2019·The counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that in terms of the provisions of Section 33 of the Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, the respondent no. 3 is empowered to take action for the relief as claimed by the petitioner. We have perused the representation dated 15.12.2018 (Annex...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sushama Sharma @ Sweta And ... vs Ravikant Viswakarma
Judges: Anil Kumar, Saurabh Lavania
26 July, 2019·1. Dispute and differences had arisen between the parties here to and First Appeal No. 99 of 2018 (u/s 19(1) of Family court Act), Smt. Susham Sharma & other Vs. Ravikant Vishwakarma was filed in Lucknow bench of Hon'ble High Court. 2. The matter was referred to Mediation/conciliation Centre vide an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Cholamandalam Investment And ... vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Bharati Sapru, Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
26 July, 2019·Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. The matter is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself. Heard Shri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the State. Demands have been raised from the petitioner against the as...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shera @ Ashish Kumar vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Pritinker Diwaker
26 July, 2019·Counsel for the appellant submits: (i) that there is delay in lodging the FIR and the same has not been explained by the prosecution; (ii)that the prosecutrix was recovered on 23.2.2019 and on the same day, her diary statement was recorded; (iii) that in Section 161 Cr PC statement, the prosecutrix ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India Through The General ... vs Pratap Bahadur And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
26 July, 2019·"Whether the action of the Railway Administration in relation to their Loco Shed, Northern Railway, Lucknow in terminating the services of the following 207 workers in Annexure with effect from 9.4.1987 is justified. If not, to what relief are the said workmen entitled?" 3. The Reference was answere...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Nath Sinha vs Central Administrative Tribunal ...
Judges: Bharati Sapru, Siddharth
26 July, 2019·Order on Review Application No. 02 of 2018 Heard Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the review applicant and petitioner, Sri Kailash Nath Sinha, in person. Counsel for the review applicant/respondent no. 3 has submitted that the judgment and order dated 07.12.2017 was passed in the absence o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.