Sanjay Kumar Bajpai vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Manish Mathur
30 July, 2019·2. The petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 12.07.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from District Kheri to District Kannauj. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a perusal of the impugned transfer order will itself indicate that the petitioner as indicated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radheshyam vs State Of U.P. Thru. District ...
Judges: Irshad Ali
30 July, 2019·The trial court dismissed the application holding that the opposite parties are not necessary parties to be impleaded in the array of parties of defendant. The revisional court by recording cogent reasons and finding, has recorded that in case the aforesaid parties are not impleaded in the array of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amresh Sonkar vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Anant Kumar
30 July, 2019·The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that it is a case of circumstantial evidence. Initially, in the F.I.R., the applicant was not named. The deceased had left the house in the Company of named accused Khargo @ Mohammad Ahmad. Later on, her body was found under the bridge. The ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sulekha vs Secy. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Prishad ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba, Narendra Kumar Johari
30 July, 2019·"1. This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby restraining respondents from dispossessing/evicting the petitioner and her family members from House No.5E-5/10, Vrindavan, Telibagh Scheme, Lucknow, of which possession has been given after demolition of her earlier house....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Jaiswal vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba, Narendra Kumar Johari
30 July, 2019·(b) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Excise Commissioner, U.P. Allahabad (opposite party No.2) to decide the appeal, preferred by the petitioner under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 in respect of Model Shop, Viram Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow within a pe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satyam Yadav @ Pinkoo Yadav vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Pritinker Diwaker
30 July, 2019·(i) that a very improbable story has been put forth by the prosecutrix where she alleges that near Trauma Centre of a leading Hospital of Lucknow, she was subjected to rape; (ii) that there is delay in lodging the FIR and the said delay has not been explained by the prosecution; (iii) that the prose...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Susheel Kumar Dube & Others vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Rekha Dikshit
30 July, 2019·Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the petition. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not to be exercised in a routine manner, but it is for limited purposes, namely, to give effect to any order under the Code, or to prevent abuse of process of any Court or otherwise to secure ends...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Naryani vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
30 July, 2019·With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 to 4 has taken a preliminary objection that against the order impugned in the writ petition dated 4.5.2018, the petitioner has remedy of f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Kumar vs U.P. Jal Nigam Lucknow Thru ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
30 July, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon two judgments of this court dated 13th September, 2018 passed in writ petition No.26294(S/B) of 2018 and the judgment and order dated 14th February, 2019 passed in writ petition No.4332 (S/S) of 2019 also pertaining to the grant of post retiral bene...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Keshav Ram Pandey vs Baroda U.P. Gramin Bank Raebareli ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
30 July, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that impugned removal order dated 06.07.2019, a copy of which is annexure 3 to the petition could not have been passed by the respondents inasmuch as during the course of inquiry the petitioner had stated before the Inquiry Officer on 31.12.2005 that he ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.