Vipin Pandey And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
30 January, 2019·Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1952 of 2007 Applicant :- Vipin Pandey And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- S.K. Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Case called out in the revised list. None appears on be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Kumar vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
30 January, 2019·Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case/ Complaint Case No.2573 of 2001, under ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Pal And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Yashwant Varma
30 January, 2019·Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1826 of 2003 (Vijai Kumar Vs. Rajesh Pal And Others) alleging commission of offences under Section...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Lal vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
30 January, 2019·Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. The present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Case No.31 of 2006, (Mewa Lal Vs. Shyam Lal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijeshwar Tyagi vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Yashwant Varma
30 January, 2019·Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8877 of 2003 Applicant :- Brijeshwar Tyagi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- V.P. Srivastava,Satish K. Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J. Learned counsel for the applicant has not responded ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Preetam vs State Of U P
Judges: Suneet Kumar
30 January, 2019·Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. This is second bail application. First bail application was rejected on 09.08.2018. Heard Sri Amit Kumar holding brief of Sri Umesh Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukesh And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Naheed Ara Moonis
30 January, 2019·The applicants, through the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this court with the prayer that the further proceeding of case Crime No. 421 of 2006, under Sections 498-A and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to police station Parikshit Garh, dis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravi Sonkar vs State Of U P
Judges: Vivek Kumar Singh
30 January, 2019·Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. Heard Sri D.K.Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and also perused the record. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lochan And Another vs State Of U P
Judges: Rajiv Gupta
30 January, 2019·Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. This bail application has been filed by the applicants Lochan and Charan Singh seeking bail in Case Crime No. 469 of 2011, under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 504 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S. Rajpura,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Lal Gupta vs Chief Judicial Magistrate Mahrajganj And Others
Judges: Rajul
30 January, 2019·Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J. The case is called out. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application, even in the revised list. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order dated 19.11.2003 stands vacated. The office is directed t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.