Braj Lal Singh And Others vs Union Of India Through Divisional Engineer And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
26 February, 2019·Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. The petitioners are 57 in number. The common grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners have been granted license in the year 1977 by the Railway for one year and they are still in possession over the land. The petitioners are ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Awadhesh Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal
26 February, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jangaliya And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
26 February, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. Heard Sri Viveka Nand Rai, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondents. 2. Petitioners have already filed Original Suit No. 453 of 1987 in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (III), Mathura, w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narayan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal
26 February, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Yasin vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
26 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6695 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mohd. Yasin Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Nath Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdra...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Darshan Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
26 February, 2019·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard Shri K.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.R. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Shri T.M. Khan, Advocate appearing for the Gaon Sabha and Shri D.K. Pandey, Advocate appearing for the fourth respondent. Dars...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakhi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
26 February, 2019·2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Pal Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Jayant Banerji
26 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6723 of 2019 Petitioner :- Virendra Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anup Swaroop Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. List has been revised. No one appears to press this petition even no the revised ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uma Shanker vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Jayant Banerji
26 February, 2019·Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. Heard Shri Deo Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for all the respondents. This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent no.3, Naib Tehsildar, Saremu, Tehsil-Sadar, District Jaunpur to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Kiran Mishra vs The District Magistrate
Judges: Jayant Banerji
26 February, 2019·Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. Heard Shri S.N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. In view of the order that is proposed to be passed, no notice is required to be served on the respondent nos.3 and 4. This writ petition ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.