Nisar Ahmad vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Anil Kumar, Saurabh Lavania
17 December, 2019·Accordingly, the petitioner approached this Court for the following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding/directing the opposite party no.-2 to issue license for selling the buffalo meat to the petitioner with immediate effect." Learned coun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Bajan vs Addl. Commissioner (Admin.) Devi ...
Judges: Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
17 December, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead and add in the array of opposite parties 'The State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Revenue, Government of U.P, Secretariat Lucknow'. The amendment may be made across the day. In view of the proposed order, the private opposite parties n...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suraj (Minor) Thru. Mother Jamuna ... vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
17 December, 2019·Considering the fact that the victim is in relation of the accused-appellant, and there is likelihood of his false implication as the father of the victim is no more and, considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it would be appropriate to enlarge the accused-appell...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abha Kataria & Anr. vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Rajeev Singh
17 December, 2019·Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the complaint case was filed by the opposite party No.2 in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIIIth, Room No.32, Lucknow which was registered as Complaint Case No.2718 of 2013, under Sections 407, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Asad Mehdi Rizvi vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Manish Mathur
17 December, 2019·The applicant has voluntarily filed an undertaking dated 10.12.2019, the original copy of which has been provided to learned counsel for informant. In the aforesaid undertaking, it has been stated that the applicant had received an amount of Rs.24,01000/-, out of which an amount of about Rs.20,00,00...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Teetu Raghav vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Siddharth
17 December, 2019·Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted herein above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nanha @ Kamal Kishore vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Irshad Ali
17 December, 2019·Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He has not committed any offence. He is in custody since 1.8.2019. He next submitted that 4 cases have been shown in the gang chart against the applicant; (1) Case Crime No.273/2019 under Sections ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhupendra Kumar Pandey vs Union Of India Thru Finance Secy. ...
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
17 December, 2019·4. Counter affidavit has been filed to which rejoinder affidavit has also been filed. 5. I have heard Sri Sudhakar Pandey, appearing for the petitioner and Sri G.P. Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents, and have perused the materials brought on record. 6. Criteria for promotion to the pos...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Kumar Awasthi vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondary ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
17 December, 2019·With regard to the aforesaid query, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on certain judgments which would be considered below. The petitioner claims that while working as senior-most teacher in the institution in question he had been given officiating charge of the Principal vide o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Govind Singh vs D.D.C. Gonda And Anr.
Judges: Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
17 December, 2019·Copy of the writ petition is received in the office of C.S.C. Learned A.C.S.C. is appeared on behalf of opposite party no.1. In view of the proposed order notice to private opposite party no.2 is not necessary and therefore, the same is dispensed with. Admittedly, the consolidation of holding with r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.