Sonu Singh @ Aditya Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Anant Kumar
19 December, 2019·This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellant against impugned order dated 30.11.2019, passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act/Additional District & Sessions Judge, Lucknow in Bail Application No.8400 of 2019, arising out of Special Trial No.199/2017, Case Crime No.38 of 2015, under Sections 3...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramsaran @ Modi @ Babulal vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Irshad Ali
19 December, 2019·Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He has not committed any offence. He is in custody since 1.11.2019. He next submitted that 4 cases have been shown in the gang chart against the applicant; (1) Case Crime No.241/2019 under Sections...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arun Jyoti Verma (In Fir Arun ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Rekha Dikshit
19 December, 2019·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shakir Ali & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Rekha Dikshit
19 December, 2019·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P.Throu.Secy.Finance ... vs Amit Kumar Srivastava
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Alok Mathur
19 December, 2019·There is a delay of thirty days in filing of the appeal. The justified reasons for condonation has been given. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State has no objection. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed. The delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. The appea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rishipal (In Fir Wrongly Mention ... vs State Of ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Rekha Dikshit
19 December, 2019·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S I.F.F.D.C.Krishak Sewa ... vs Appellate Authority/Director Of ...
Judges: Jaspreet Singh
19 December, 2019·The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he had preferred an appeal under clause 32A(2) of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 against the show-cause notice No.1679/Urvarak/2017-18 dated 15.01.2019 passed by the District Agricultural Officer, Hathras. It has been submitted that on 30...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Katiyar & Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rajeev Singh
19 December, 2019·Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 407 of 2003 lodged by respondent no. 2, charge sheet dated 16.09.2004 was filed by the Investigating Officer, on which the court below had taken cognizance and thereafter, the case was committed to the court of Ses...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Dutt Awasthi vs State Of Up And Anr
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
19 December, 2019·(b). Quash the charge sheet no.1 dated 24.02.2019 under Section 406 and 420 IPC, Police Station Indrapuram, District Ghaziabad. (c). Set aside the order dated 24.05.2019 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad in Criminal Case No.19988 of 2019, Case Crime No.523 of 2018, under Section 406, 42...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lakshimi And Another vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
19 December, 2019·Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated and there is no evidence against them. The whole case is based on circumstantial evidence and recovery of some money to the tune of Rs. 25,000/- to 30,000/-. The accused applicants were living as tenant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.