Dr. Anil Kumar Shukla @ A.K. Shukla vs Central Bureau Of Investigation, ...
Judges: Rajeev Singh
20 December, 2019·"19. Previous sanction necessary for prosecution.--(1) No court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Sections 7, 10, 11, 13 and 15 alleged to have been committed by a public servant, except with the previous sanction,-- (a) in the case of a person who is employed in connection with t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rishi Kumar Mishra @ Ranjan Mishra vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rajeev Singh
20 December, 2019·During course of arguments, learned counsel for the applicant placed before this court a photocopy of bail order of co-accused Tushar Mishra is taken on record. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but has fairly conceded that similarly situated co-accused has alr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nitesh Trivedi vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Aniruddha Singh
20 December, 2019·Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no previous criminal history and the case of present applicant is identical to co-accused Raju Nishad and Saajan who has been enlarged on...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tarvez vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Aniruddha Singh
20 December, 2019·Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that criminal history has been explained. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Farooq Shekh & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Mohd Faiz Khan
20 December, 2019·3. We have considered the stand of learned counsel for the State. In Arnesh Kumar's case (supra) the following(relevant portion) has been held:- "9. Another provision i.e. Section 41A Cr.P.C aimed to avoid unnecessary arrest or threat of arrest looming large on accused requires to be vitalised. Sect...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Omveer Saini Alias Vikas Saini vs State Of ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Mohd Faiz Khan
20 December, 2019·3. We have considered the stand of learned counsel for the State. In Arnesh Kumar's case(supra) the following(relevant portion) has been held:- "9. Another provision i.e. Section 41A Cr.PC aimed to avoid unnecessary arrest or threat of arrest looming large on accused requires to be vitalised. Sectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Durgesh @ Durga Rajbhar vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
20 December, 2019·(i) the applicant is accused of offence of rape, punishable with imprisonment upto life; (ii) against FIR lodged on 30.12.2017, the applicant is in confinement since 11.1.2018; (iii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arres...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kunwar Vishnu Kumar Singh vs State Of ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
20 December, 2019·(i) The petitioner would pay a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- (five lacs) against the due amount within a period of 15 days from today. (ii) The respondent-bank would furnish the statement of due amount to the petitioner within 15 days alongwith updated interest. (iii) The rest of the due amount with interes...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pinki Singh @ Pratibha Singh @ ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home ...
Judges: Karunesh Singh Pawar
20 December, 2019·The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. The disputed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravindra Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home ...
Judges: Rajeev Singh
20 December, 2019·3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that on the basis of concocted facts, the complaint case was filed by the opposite party No.2, which was registered as Complaint Case No. 6650 of 2012 (Ashok Singh vs. Ravindra Pratap Singh), under Section 138 of N.I. Act, P.S. Madiyaon, District Luckno...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.