Nirpendra Kumar Singh vs State
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
22 August, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by order dated 14.05.1992 passed by Additional Munsif Magistrate, Firozabad i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Triveni Engineering Works ... vs Commissioner Trade Tax U.P. ...
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
22 August, 2019·(iii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the levy of tax on sale of boilers in running condition and embedded to earth amounting to Rs.3,50,00,000/- was justified? (iv) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the levy of tax on the turnover amounting to R...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy., ... vs Ali Mohmmad.
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
22 August, 2019·(5) The writ petitioner has challenged the aforesaid order of dismissal dated 16.8.2007 by filing Service Single No. 722 of 2008, which was allowed vide judgment and order dated 24.4.2013 by quashing the order of dismissal dated 16.8.2007 with the direction to reinstate the writ petitioner within a ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Km. Shabana Throu.Her Mother Smt. ... vs State Of ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
22 August, 2019·Let the respondent no.4 produce the petitioner, namely, Km. Shabana, before this Court on 17.08.2019." 13. On 17.08.2019, the detenue was produced by the police personnel of Police Station Mahila Thana, District Lucknow. Mother of detenue was also present in the Court. On being asked the detenue rep...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Triveni Engineering And ... vs Commissioner Trade Tax U.P. ...
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
22 August, 2019·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in believing that the sales were made by the applicant and not by Okhla New Delhi Unit of the applicant?" 4. Submission advanced by learned counsel for the assessee that during the assessment in question, the ass...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Awadh Kishor Umrao vs Pappu Gupta, Assistant Collector ...
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
22 August, 2019·"The petitioner has approached this Court praying for a writ of mandamus directing respondent no. 2 to remove the illegal encroachments made by respondent nos. 5 to 8 over Gata Nos. 103 and 104, which the petitioner alleges to be Gaon Sabha property. However, from the records annexed with the writ p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manish Ranjan vs Allahabad Bank Head Office ...
Judges: Sunita Agarwal
22 August, 2019·In the year 2012 after marriage, the name of dependents given by the deceased employee also included the petitioner and old parents. Further, the mother of the petitioner gave an application on 28.9.2015 certifying that the deceased employee was the sole bread earner of the family and all of them we...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghav Bahl vs Union Of India And Another
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Raj Beer Singh
22 August, 2019·3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner, who is a journalist and editor, has entered into Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 30.11.2015 with ST George Blackfriars Limited to purchase a property in London (foreign asset) against consideration of GBP 2,725,00...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shambhu Ram And 2 Others vs Dev Kumar And 2 Others
Judges: Jayant Banerji
22 August, 2019·The defendant-respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed their written statement denying the allegations made against them. In the written statement, it is stated that the defendant-respondent No.3 had approached the defendant-respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and had cited need of money for selling the land. It was state...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sewak Kushwaha vs Om Prakash, Tehsildar / Assistant ...
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
22 August, 2019·Counter affidavit has been filed by the Standing Counsel stating that Case Nos. T-201805200203565, T-201805200203554, T-201805200203553, T-201805200203563, T-201805200203564, T-201805200203570, T-201805200203576, T-201805200203573, T-201805200203381, T-201805200203552, T-201805200203374, T-201805200...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.