Ramesh Gupta vs State Of U P
Judges: Siddharth
14 September, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The argument is that the applicant is not named in the first information report. His name has surfaced in the statement of the co-accused after two & half months. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepak vs State Of U P
Judges: Siddharth
14 September, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. The argument is that the co-accused Pappu @ Yusuf Khan has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 16.08.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.30849 of 2018. The prayer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saghir vs State Of U P
Judges: Aniruddha Singh
14 September, 2018·According to the prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against four accused persons namely, Faredin, Arshad @ Kaliya, Sageer and Momin alleging that on 10.7.2018 accused Faredin, Arshad @ Kaliya were arrested by the police with 50 Kg. beef and some instruments for slaughtering and accused Sageer and M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nagendra Yadav vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
14 September, 2018·(i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile on the date of alleged incident being 16 years 11 months of age; (ii) though the applicant was not named in the F.I.R. and his name was subsequently introduced after one year of the incident. (iii) the applicant has been completely falsely implicated on a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Raj Bind vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: J
14 September, 2018·3. By the impugned order dated 06.08.2018 passed in Case no.82 of 2015, Ram Raj Bind vs. Ram Milan, the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur has rejected the said application. Aggrieved, the present revision has been filed. 4. The provisions of Section 125 (1) Cr.P.C. reads as under:- “(1) If any ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukul Minor vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
14 September, 2018·2. Present revision has been filed to quash the order dated 08.12.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Court No. 11 Ghaziabad in Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 2016 (Mukul versus State of U.P.) and the order dated 20.9.2016 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Ghaziabad in case crime No. 1126 o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Yadav vs State Of U P & Another
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
14 September, 2018·(i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile on the date of alleged incident being 16 years 3 months of age, while the age of victim was about 15 to 16 years on that date; (ii) the medical report negates the allegation of rape and physical violence. (iii) the applicant has been completely falsely im...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Kumar Soni vs State Of U P
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
14 September, 2018·(i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile on the date of alleged incident being 16 years of age, while the age of victim was about 15 to 18 years on that date; (ii) the medical report negates the allegation of rape and physical violence. (iii) the applicant has been completely falsely implicated....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Swarup Narain Pandey vs Contral Govt. / I.T. & Others
Judges: Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
14 September, 2018·Called in revised. None present. As a last chance to them, list on 27th September, 2018. Order Date :- 14.9.2018 Mukesh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.