Rameshwar Prasad vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
14 September, 2018·1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: “(a) issue a writ order or direction in th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saraman Lal vs U P S R T C And Another
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
14 September, 2018·1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Sri M.M. Sahai, Advocate is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: “I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the natu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
14 September, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Pursuant to this Court's order dated 09.08.2018, notice was issued to petitioner to engage another counsel on 16.08.2018. Perused Office Report dated 13.09.2018. Service is deemed sufficient. 2. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gaurav Kumar vs Court Of Additional Civil Judge Court No Allahabad And Another
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
14 September, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondent. The applicant has approached this Court to expedite the proceedings of Case No.89 of 2010 (Balram vs. Smt. Madhu Agrawal an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Pallavi Pandey vs Principal Family Court And Another
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
14 September, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondent. The petitioner has approached this Court to expedite the proceedings of suit No. 1773 of 2016 pending before Principal Jud...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar Srivastava vs Civil Judge And Another
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
14 September, 2018·Respondent :- Civil Judge And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has approached this Court to expedite and decide the Original Suit No. 768 of 2016 pending before Civil Judge (Junior Divi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Shanti Devi vs Prabhawati Devi And Another
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
14 September, 2018·Respondent :- Prabhawati Devi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has approached this Court to expedite and decide the Original Suit No. 440 of 2012 (Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Pr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Samujh And Another vs Radhey Shyam And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
14 September, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondent. The applicant has approached this Court to expedite the proceedings of Civil Suit No.641 of 2016 (Umesh and others vs. Radh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangala Prasad vs Shiv Prasad And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
14 September, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed today, notices need not go to the private respondent. The petitioner has approached this Court to expedite the recall application registered as Misc. Case No. 71 of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangala Prasad vs Shiv Prasad And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
14 September, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed today, notices need not go to the private respondent. The petitioner has approached this Court to expedite the recall application registered as Misc. Case No. 69...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.