Shanti Devi vs The Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard Syed Faiz Hasnain, learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri P.K. Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Diwakar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Gaon Sabha. The petitioner is challenging the validity of the order impugned...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sundar Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
28 November, 2018·2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being finally disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit. 3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing recovery certificate for Rs. 2,42,000/- plus other charges. 4. The petitione...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sonam Kumari And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2018·Record in question reflects that parents of the first petitioner had lodged an F.I.R. against the second petitioner. The same was registered as Case Crime No. 927 of 2017, u/s 366, 376 & 506 I.P.C., P.S. Barra, District Kanpur Nagar. In the said case, the second petitioner has been enlarged ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jyoti And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Santosh Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jyoti And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2018·Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of parties. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. Learned...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shama And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 November, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Vivek Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satendra Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
28 November, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the recovery citation dated 9.10.2018, (Annexure-2 to the writ petiton), whereunder a sum of Rs. 2,76,684/- is sought to be recovered from him. The afo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Verma vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
28 November, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 3. The petitioner is facing recovery of the loan amount taken by him for purchasing a car. A notice unde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Dayal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
28 November, 2018·2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being finally disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit. 3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing impugned recovery certificate dated 06.07.2018 for Rs. 3,28,000/-. 4. The pe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satendra Kumar Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
28 November, 2018·The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking quashing of the order dated 31.10.2018 whereby the respondents no.1 & 2 have nominated the respondent no.6 as nominated member in the respondent no.4-Society. It appears that a 'Motion of No Confidence' was brought against the respondent no.5. Two writ ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.