Sudha Srivastava vs Registrar, Firms Societies And ...
Judges: Manoj Misra
31 May, 2018·Bye-law No.2 (c ) defines Board as follows: "Board means the Board of Management consisting of 4-10 office bearers who shall be residents of apartments in SPS Residency condominium." Bye-law No.4 provides as to who shall be members of the Association, which reads as follows:- "4. Members of Associat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Kumar @ Chintu And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Dinesh Kumar Singh I
31 May, 2018·This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 5.10.2017, registered as case crime No.507 of 2017, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 409, 34, 120-B I.P.C. and 3,4,5 & 6 of the Prize and Chits Fund Money Circulation Banning Act, 1978, Police Station Nauchandi, D...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambika Singh Uchchattar ... vs State Of U.P. & 5 Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal, Shashi Kant
31 May, 2018·Though in the report of the District Magistrate, it has been stated that there were no such institutions in existence, we clarify that due steps will be taken to verify the physical existence of the institutions concerned and, in the event, such institutions or any of them are found available, oppor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanu Alias Badre Alam vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Dinesh Kumar Singh I
31 May, 2018·This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 21.3.2017, registered as case crime No.100 of 2017, under Sections 386, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Tiwaripur, District Gorakhpur. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Lal Srivastava vs Presiding Officer, Central Govt. ...
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
31 May, 2018·30. Forgery and Fraud are essentially matters of evidence which could be proved as a fact by direct evidence or by inferences drawn from proved facts. 31. The Privy Council in Satish Chandra Chatterjee vs. Kumar Satish Kantha Roy & Ors. Air 1923 PC 73, laid down as under: "Charges of fraud and collu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalji Jaisawal vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Dinesh Kumar Singh I
31 May, 2018·The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 26.5.2018, registered as case crime No.146 of 2018, under Section 60 of U.P. Excise Act and under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Lalganj, District Mirzapur. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jahangir @ Guddu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rajesh Dayal Khare, Rajiv Gupta
31 May, 2018·It is next contended that since there is no independent witness in the present case and all the witnesses, who have been examined, are interested witnesses, therefore, their testimony cannot be relied upon and the order of conviction, which has been returned by the Trial Judge, is clearly unsustaina...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradhan Prabandhank/Unit Head ... vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Manoj Misra
31 May, 2018·I have heard Sunil Tripathi, Sri Pandey Rajeev Rajhans and Sri Bharat Kumar Srivastava for the petitioner; and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri Nitin Kumar Agarwal, for the State-respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner assailed the reference order by...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rohit Singh And Anr. vs U.P. Jal Nigam Thru. Managing ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
31 May, 2018·Notices on behalf of opposite party Nos.1 to 5 have been accepted by Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel. Let the counter affidavit be filed by the opposite parties within a period of three weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within ten days thereafter. List after expiry of the aforesai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Navneet Kaur & Anr vs Principal Judge Family Court Lko
Judges: Rakesh Srivastava
31 May, 2018·(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, afte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.