Shatrughan Kumar Yadav And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J. Heard Sri Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri R.K.Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State and perused the impugned FIR as well as material brought on record. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR da...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Shekhar@ Lallu vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the respondents-State and perused the record. The petition for writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred with a prayer to quash the first infor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesar And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the respondents-State and perused the record. This petition for writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred with a prayer to quash the first information report dated 14.2...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kuldeep Siromani And Ors vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
23 March, 2018·Heard Sri Alkesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Ibha Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned FIR as well as material brought on record. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 27.2.2018 registered as Case Crime No.308...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Isalam And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard Sri Pankaj Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the respondents-State and perused the record. The petition for writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred with a prayer to quash the first information...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Durgesh Gupta & Others vs State Of U P & Others
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. Sri Jitendra Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Int...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarfaraz vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard Sri Rakesh Narain Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vivek Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no.4, learned AGA for the respondents-State and perused the record. The petition for writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Yatish Kumar Dwivedi for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for State of U.P. and Sri Habib Ahmad for respondent-bank. This writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent- bank to redress the grievance of the petitioner. A perusal of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepak Rajak vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
23 March, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Heard Sri Prabha Shanker Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel. This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no. 2 / Tehsildar Madhuban, District Mau to decid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Nisha Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
23 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.