Basic Shiksha Parishad vs The U.P.P.S.T.Lucknow
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Saurabh Lavania
21 December, 2018·Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is after a gap of about 16 years the Suspension Order was challenged and the claim petition was highly belated and in the counter there was absolute denial on very existence of Order of appointment and suspension of the respondent No. 2. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amar Chandra vs State Of U.P. Trhu Collector ...
Judges: Rakesh Srivastava
21 December, 2018·"------------mHk;i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.kksa dh cgl dks lqukA okn esas fu/kkZfjr 4 fcUnqvksa ds fuLrkj.k bl izdkj gaSA 1- D;k erx.kuk esa /kkW/kyh gq;h gS\ xzke iapk;r y{e.kiqj] cwFk la[;k v0ij 475 er og c cwFk ij 382 er dqy 857 er iM+s FksA dqy erksa esa 75 er x.kuk ds le; voS/k dj fn;k x;kA ftl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Feroz Varun Gandhi(M.P.) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rahul Chaturvedi
21 December, 2018·That on 17.03.2009 the S.H.O., P.S. Barkhera, Pilibhit has lodged an FIR against the applicant during election of the year 2009. The said FIR was registered giving rise to case crime no. 255/2009, u/s 153A, 295A, 505 (2) IPC and section 125 Representation of People Act, 1951 and after investigation ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nari Bhan Singh vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Bachchoo Lal
21 December, 2018·The contention as raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused-applicant was not named in the FIR, even he was not named in the statement of the complainant recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and it was after a period of about 45 days, complainant has given an applicati...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kapilendra Yadav And Ors vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
21 December, 2018·Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Nand Lal Pandey,Suyash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. An application has been filed by the petitioners, duly supported with the affidavit of petitioner no. 2, stating that they do not want to pr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Shankar Lal Prajapati vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
21 December, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner. 2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: “a) issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned suspension order dated 27.9.200...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Geeta Pandey vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
21 December, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner. 2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: “(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari summoning the record of the case and quash the order dated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nagendra Pratap Singh Tomar vs State Of U P & Other
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
21 December, 2018·1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner. 2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: “(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the orders dt. 30.10.2004 (Annexures-6 to the writ petition) and the order date...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjeet Kumar And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Ajit Kumar
21 December, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27770 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sanjeet Kumar And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Gautam,Manoj Kumar,Ramesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shama Afreen vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajit Kumar
21 December, 2018·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Syed Nadeem Ahmad, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that having obtained scanned copy of the answer-sheet of the Recruitment Examination-2018 for the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.