Tufani Ram vs D I O S & Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: "i) to issue a writ, o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Nirmala Sharma vs State Of U P & Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner. 2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: "(i) A writ, direction or order in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to treat the respondent institu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahir Khan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the na...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Paras Nath Singh vs Manager
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner. 2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to take collection charges on the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Asare vs Prabandh Nideshak U P Rajya Hath Kargha Nigam & Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: "I) To issue a writ, order or direction in the n...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Kumar vs State Of U P Thru ' Sec Edu U P Govt Lucknow And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to call for the record and quash the order dated 23.1.2003 (Annexure no.10 to this writ petition). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents no.1 to 5 to promote the petitioner ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vivek Kumar vs State Of U P Thru ' The Secretary Basic Education And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Asha Pandey vs Joint Director Of Education And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: "a) to issue a writ, o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Munni Devi Sharma vs District Basic Shiksha Adhikari And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Heard Sri S. K. Lal, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner contended that impugned order of termination of service has been passed on the direction of U. P. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Trib...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shailendra Kumar Khanna vs Chief Manager State Bank Of India And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 April, 2018·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Sri B.B. Jauhari, learned counsel for petitioner, states that by efflux of time, this matter has rendered infructuous. 2. Dismissed accordingly. 3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. Sri S.K. Kakkar, counsel for respondents is present. Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Sidd...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.