Ram Lochan @ Tarun Kumar vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
28 January, 2010·The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the present case, none is named in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that on 23.10.2009, the accused-applicant was apprehended by the police alongwith four other accused persons. As alleged, Rs.3000/- and one knife was recovered from th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Chandra S/O Ram Samokhan & ... vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Home & Ors.
Judges:
28 January, 2010·Under challenge in the writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 42 of 2010 under Sections 467, 468, 419, 420, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station - Ram Gaon, district Bahraich. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the material on record includin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Asthana vs Ist A.D.J. Gonda
Judges:
28 January, 2010·List has been revised. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. None appears on behalf of the respondents. In the interest of justice, list in the next cause list. Order Date :- 28.1.2010 psd...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Smt. Naima Rehman & Others
Judges:
28 January, 2010·2. Whether the deceased Khalid Hussain driver of motorcycle was having valid and effective driving licence at the time of the accident? 3. Whether motorcycle involved in the accident was insured with opposite party no.2 at the time of the accident? 4. Whether the petition is barred by section 64 (V)...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
St. John'S College, Agra Thru ... vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. ...
Judges:
28 January, 2010·Notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1, has been accepted by the learned Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Shishir Jain has accepted notice on behalf of respondents no. 2 and 3. List and connect with Writ Petition No. 11617 (MB) of 2009. The claim of the petitioner is that the present institution is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satendra Kumar Saxena vs State Of U.P. & Others
Judges:
28 January, 2010·We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. In the case of Mahendra Lal Das v State of Bihar 2002 SCC (Crl) 110 it has been held by the Supreme Court that while interference by Courts at investigation stage is not called for, the investigating agency cannot be given latit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Km. Vineeta Bajpai, vs State Of U.P., Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges:
28 January, 2010·In nutshell, the case of the petitioner is that an advertisement was published for the post of Constables in the Police Department. In pursuance of the advertisement, the petitioner applied for the aforesaid post. The petitioner has also been issued admit card. As she was unwell at the time of physi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajendra @ Mannu vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
28 January, 2010·Next submission made by learned counsel is that there was no intention on the part of the applicant to make attempt to commit the murder of injured Amar Singh, as fire is said to have been made on the complainant Purushottam and not on the injured. Having considered the submissions made by learned c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Kumar Gupta S/O Late Daya ... vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. & ...
Judges:
28 January, 2010·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A for the State. We have gone through the material on record including FIR in question. Let notice be issued to opposite party No. 4 who may file counter affidavit. A counter affidavit on behalf of the State be also filed before the next date....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.