Prem Nath Son Of Late Vishwa Nath vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: P Mithal
19 March, 2008·3. Heard Sri Yogesh Agarwal, learned Counsel for petitioner, Sri C.K. Parekh, learned Counsel appearing for the Nagar Palika Parishad, Mirzapur and learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1. Sri Parekh has raised a preliminary objection that against the order of suspension the petitioner has an ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Asha Kapoor Wife Of Sri S.P. ... vs Addl. Collector (Finance And ...
Judges: S Ambwani
19 March, 2008·3. It is contended that the condition of deposit is highly onerous and that the order was not considered on merit before directing the parties to deposit one-half of the amount. It is further contended that the deposit of one-half of the amount is against the statutory requirement of deposit of one-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shahadat S/O Ali Zaan (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: B A Zaidi
19 March, 2008·1. The accused is charged with having forcible coition with the prosecutrix who is a married lady, in a field, where she had gone to case herself. No injury was found on the person of prosecutrix. The case was registered under the direction of the Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. but it is si...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Avtar S/O Late Sri Sukhi vs State Of U.P. Through The Chief ...
Judges: V Sahai, R Misra
18 March, 2008·(1) There was no wide publication of the notice for auction. (2) The bid amount was low. (3) There was apprehension of breach of peace in the village in letting out the pond for pisciculture for a period of 10 years. 3. By the impugned order, re-auction of the pond was proposed. As regards the wide ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
District Bar Association Through ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: A Kumar, S Agarwal
18 March, 2008·4. Learned Standing Counsel however appearing for respondent No. 3 submits that since the fund for construction of lawyers' chamber has been provided by the State Government, therefore, the State Government is fully empowered to own and control the subsequent maintenance etc. of the said Chamber and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
District Administrative ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: D Singh
18 March, 2008·3. The respondent workman was appointed a Cadre Secretary and the Chief Executive of the Co-operative Society in 1976. He was placed under suspension on 11.3.1992 whereafter a charge sheet levelling several charges, including for financial misdemeanour was served on him on 23.3.1993 and after holdin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baij Nath Ram Son Of Rupa (Dead) ... vs Smt. Sonmati Wife Of Ram Chandar ...
Judges: P Srivastav
17 March, 2008·3. Second appeal No. 230 of 2007 arises out of Civil Suit No. 88 of 1987-Ramesh Bhar and Sonmati v. Baij Nath and Ram Chandar which was decreed, against which regular appeal was filed vide Civil Appeal No. 243 of 1991-(sic) Nath Bhar v. Ramesh Bhar and Ors. Both the appeals were dismissed by a commo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shyam vs Nabbu Ram (D.) By L.Rs. And Anr.
Judges: P Srivastav
17 March, 2008·4. A written notice was given by Sri Mayarik Agrawal to Sri A.K. Trivedi, advocate. It appears that there was an endorsement of refusal to accept the notice. The said notice dated 17.3.2008 with a noting made by Sri Mayank Agrawal, advocate 'refused to accept' dated 17.3.2008, time 1.30 p.m. has bee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anil Kumar S/O Lakhmi Ram vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: B Chauhan, A Tandon
14 March, 2008·Possession of the acquired land would be taken only by way of a memorandum, Panchnama, which is a legally accepted norm. It would not be possible to take any physical possession. Therefore, subsequent continuation, if any, had by the erstwhile owner is only illegal or unlawful possession which does ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Asharphi Devi Wife Of Late ... vs The State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: A Lala, S Kumar
14 March, 2008·i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, restraining the respondents from allotting the land in dispute in favour of the respondent No. 3. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.