Rajeshji Verma S/O Late Prem Mohan ... vs Abhineet Kesarwani Son Of Shri ...
Judges: K Rakhra, R Rastogi
17 January, 2008·5. Whether claimants are entitled to get compensation. If yes, to what amount and from which of the opposite parties? 6. Whether Maruti Van No. UP-70 N-5590 was insured with the opposite party No. 2 ( Oriental Insurance Company) If not, then its effect? 7. Whether opposite party No. 4, driver of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajeev Kumar Jain S/O Shri Prakash ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: R Tiwari
17 January, 2008·Consequently, order dated 18.8.2007 is hereby quashed. Let election proceeding be concluded from the stage it has been stayed and whosoever is aggrieved against the result of election has right to approach Prescribed Authority after mustering support of 1/4th members of General Body of the Society u...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjai Kumar Alias Mallu vs Manoj Kumar Sahu And Ors.
Judges: V Sahai, R Misra
17 January, 2008·5. As agains this, the learned Counsels for the respondents has argued that the word 'District Court' having jurisdiction to try the suit appearing in the said section means the Court inferior to District Judge having jurisdiction and in such way on the basis of valuation the suit was filed in the C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Triveni Singh Wife Of Late Sri ... vs State Of U.P. Through The Chief ...
Judges: V Sahai, R Misra
17 January, 2008·(i) neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage; (ii)at the time of the marriage, neither party- (a) is incapable of giving a valid consent to it in consequence of unsoundness of mind; or (b) though capable of giving a valid consent has been suffering from mental disorder of such a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeshik Co-Operative Dairy ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, S Chauhan
17 January, 2008·2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows: For the asst. yr. 1990-91 the appellant filed return of loss which was processed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act. Prima facie adjustment to the extent of Rs. 36,28,690 was made resulting into liability of additional tax...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangalsen Alias Manga Son Of ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: K Rakhra, R Rastogi
16 January, 2008·10. An incised wound on left side neck 1" x 1/10" x muscle deep 11. An incised wound on left side neck 1/2" x 1/10" x muscle deep 12. An incised wound on left side neck 1" x 1/10" x vessels deep 13. An incised wound in front of neck 1" x ½" x trachea deep 14. An incised wound in zygomatic region 3" ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Upendra Kumar, B.K.O. vs Sales Tax Officer
Judges: S Harkauli, R Sharma
16 January, 2008·(a) In Sub-section (2) after the existing proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely: Provided further that the assessment or reassessment for the assessment year 1987-88 may be made by March 31, 1993. (b) After Sub-section (4), the following Sub-section shall be inserted, namely,- (4-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Adhar Son Of Sri Ramdeo vs State Of U.P.
Judges: K Rakhra, R Rastogi
16 January, 2008·10. The prosecution produced Doodhnath as P.W. 1. He stated on oath that on 2.1.94 at 10 A.M. all the accused came to his Abadi and started to damage his well, then his brother Ramayan asked them not to do so and then they attacked Ramayan, and the accused Ram Adhar, who was armed with gun, fired fr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Committee Of Management, ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: R Tiwari
16 January, 2008·3. Contention of the learned Counsel for petitioner is that since certain irregularities had been committed by Brijendra Singh Rathore, the patron/governing body by its resolution dated 8.10.2006 removed him alongwith Amba Singh Rathore and Vijay Pal Singh. An election of the Committee of Management...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Bhan Singh And Ors. vs Vijai Shanker And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
15 January, 2008·4. During arguments at the final hearing stage of this appeal on 15.11.2007, Sri R. N. Singh, learned senior counsel for the appellants, argued only first and second substantial question of law (supra). Absolutely, no argument regarding Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act was advanced, hence there is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.