Daya Shanker Yadav Son Of Mukut ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: S Harkauli, S Agarwal
28 January, 2008·3(2-A) The additional tax in respect of a public service vehicle owned or controlled by a State Transport Undertaking other than the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation shall be levied and paid in accordance with the agreement entered into with the concerned States under Sub-section(6) of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Prasad Yadav Son Of Sri ... vs Chairman, Samyut Kshetriya ...
Judges: B Chauhan, A Tandon
28 January, 2008·4.1 The Hon'ble Single Judge in last but one paragraph of the said judgment has further noticed that certain facts stated for the first time in the rejoinder affidavit do make out a case in favour of the petitioner but since no opportunity has been given to the respondents to counter the said facts,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surya Prakash Dwivedi S/O ... vs State Of U.P. Through It'S Chief ...
Judges: S Ambwani
28 January, 2008·4. Learned Counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, submit that the District Panchayat Raj Officer directed the District Horticulture Officer, and that the notice by bit of drum to verify the signatures/thumb impression on the notice of 'no confidence motion' was a proper procedure. According ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
University Of Allahabad Through ... vs Sant Lal S/O Sri Ram Kripal And Ors.
Judges: H Gokhale, V Saran
25 January, 2008·5. On the other hand the respondents-writ petitioners, claim that there is no difference between the hostel wing and the tutorial wing of William Holland University College and the appellant-University is illegally denying the benefit of payment of salary to the hostel wing employees, to which they ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandan Kumar Singh Son Of Sri ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through Its ...
Judges: R Tiwari
25 January, 2008·Result of the petitioner for the session 2006-07 has been cancelled on the ground that he had been caught by the flying squad. Original record has been produced by the University which have been perused by the counsel for the petitioner. 2. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that in his...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manish Engineering Enterprises vs The Managing Director, Indian ...
Judges: H Ghokhale
25 January, 2008·9. The respondents thereafter filed their review application on 3.7.2006. They submitted that they did not get time to controvert some of the documents, which were relied upon by the applicant and the said documents were not made available to them. That apart, they pointed out that the claim was cle...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smart Builders Through Its ... vs Smt. Chandra Dickshit Widow Of ...
Judges: H Gokhale
25 January, 2008·6. The applicant opposed this application by filing a counter affidavit, which was filed after more than eight months on 5.1.2007. In that affidavit, it was stated that the applicant was an old lady and she was filing the objection with the help of her grand son, who stayed in Mumbai since she had l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parmeshwar Deen vs The State
Judges: S Shanker
25 January, 2008·3. The prosecution in support of its case examined seven witnesses in all. P.W.1 S.I. Paramhans Yadav was the arresting officer and member of the police party. P.W. 2 H.C. (P.B.) Vijay Pratap was also the arresting officer and member of the police party as well as the injured witness. P.W. 3 S.I. As...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar Tiwari Son Of Sarju ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Smt. ...
Judges: A Saran
24 January, 2008·2. This application has been filed for quashing charge-sheet dated 7.10.2007 filed by the investigating officer against the applicant in Case Crime No. 146C of 2007, under Sections 420/465/466/468/471 IPC, PS Soraon, District Allahabad. 3 The allegations in the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rekha (Kinner) Son Of Kameshwar vs State Of U.P. Through Chief ...
Judges: A Kumar, R Sharma
24 January, 2008·(ii) within the meaning of Section 82 knowingly acquired or continued to have, directly or indirectly or by a partner, any share or interest, whether pecuniary or of any other nature, in any contract or employment with, by or on behalf of the [Municipality]; or (iii) knowingly acted as a President o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.