Smt. Raj Kumari Awasthi And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: A Saran
31 January, 2008·8. The Apex Court also was of the view that no exception could be taken to the judgement/order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court in maintaining the order passed by the family court, which was based on a combined reading of Section 125 of the Code and Section 20(3) of HAM Act as it...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lavi Yadav Alias Love Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: R Rastogi
31 January, 2008·2. Since certified copy of the order dated 16.11.2006 was not filed by the revisionist, this revision was registered as Defective Criminal Revision No. 88 of 2007. An application for exemption was also filed by the revisionist and that application was allowed by Hon'ble V.K. Chaturvedi, J. vide his ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Asian Paints Ltd. Through Sri ... vs The New Okhala Industrial ...
Judges: A Bhushan, R Sharma
31 January, 2008·That the Lessee will start construction within six months from the date of possession and will construct a minimum of area as per bye-laws of authority as applicable for building and put the same in operation as per plans approved by the Lessor within a period of 2(two) years from the dale of posses...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neetu Devi Singh Daughter Of Shri ... vs High Court Of Judicature At ...
Judges: B Chauhan, A Tandon
31 January, 2008·4. On the, contrary it is submitted by Shri Amlt Sthalekar, learned Counsel for the respondents that the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge does not require any interference whatsoever in view of the fact that the Selection Committee was competent to prescribe minimum qualifying marks an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Occupier/Director, Hindustan ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: D Singh
31 January, 2008·Argument is that the Deputy Labour Commissioner without deciding objection as was raised on behalf of the petitioners in respect to the jurisdiction to deal with the matter and by recording incorrect finding in respect to finality of the claim of the private respondents in respect of acceptance of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Goyal Agencies Through Its ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: V Prasad, A K Singh
31 January, 2008·2.1 Learned senior counsel for the petitioners further harangued that it will be a travesty of justice if an unscrupulous litigant is allowed to launch a malicious prosecution in any part of the country, whether or not any part of the incident has occurred there or not and if such a practice is allo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Govinda Son Of Krishna Murari ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Shiv ...
Judges: A Sahi
31 January, 2008·5. The Court also recorded that in case the version of Shiv Mangal was correct that he had gone to the police station to get the case registered, he would have been apprehended there on the same day and further in the police report, it was also indicated by the Circle Officer upon a spot inspection ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwati Prasad S/O Gaya Prasad vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: A Sahi
31 January, 2008·3. Pending these proceedings, the petitioner's father Gaya Prasad is said to have executed a sale-deed of the said property by a registered document in favour of the contesting respondent - Rajdev Yadav and the other members of the family on 31.7.1991. The petitioner asserts that he came to know abo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Karma Gramodyog Vikas Samiti ... vs State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: S Harkauli, S Agarwal
30 January, 2008·2. The original assessment order stands challenged in appeal. During the pendency of appeal the Assessing Authority discovered new material showing undisclosed turnover. Proceedings under Section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 were initiated culminating in the impugned order of the Assessing Aut...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muir Mills, A Unit Of National ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Judges: D Singh
30 January, 2008·4. The respondent workman was appointed on temporary basis as peon in the petitioner Mill in 1981 but his services were retrenched with effect from 6.9.1983 which led to a reference which was registered as Adjudication No. 318 of 1984. The Labour Court vide its award dated 29.7.1987, finding that th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.