Sri Bhojraj Wadhwa And Anr. vs The Ix Additional District Judge ...
Judges: D Gupta
13 February, 2008·10. In order to appreciate the contentions advanced by the learned Counsel for the parties, it would be appropriate to reproduce Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act as amended in U.P. by U.P. Act No. 24 of 1954 and the same is as follows: In the absence of a contract or local law or usage to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Azimuddin @ Kunta S/O Abdul Aziz ... vs State Of U.P. And Smt. Mobina D/O ...
Judges: A Saran
12 February, 2008·1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. A notice under Section 9(b) and 37(2)/1c/Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, hereinafter referred to as the Act, dated 14.11.2007 has been challenged by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 2. The fir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudarshan Maurya Son Of Sri Ram ... vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of ...
Judges: V Sahai, R Misra
12 February, 2008·7. Fulfilment of Minimum Net Business during years of failure: An agent aspiring to enter into or continue membership of any club must bring in the following net minimum business in the year of failure and keep the agency in force. This will be operative from Financial Year 2001-2002. --------------...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shahzad Ahmad Khan And Ors. vs Mohd. Ahmad And Ors.
Judges: V Sahai, R Misra
12 February, 2008·4. The main and only question involved in this appeal is whether the third party-appellants are proper and necessary party to the aforesaid suit, under Order XXII, Rule 10, C.P.C. 5. The learned Counsel for the appellants has argued that since the owner of the property (defendant-respondent No. 3), ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mannu Lal And 33 Ors. And Kamal ... vs Deputy Labour Commissioner And ...
Judges: V Shukla
12 February, 2008·Where there is no express exclusion the examination of the remedies and the scheme of the particular Act to find out the intendment becomes necessary and the result of the inquiry may be decisive. In the latter case it is necessary to see if the statute creates a special right or a liability and pro...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girind Singh Yadav And Anr. Etc. vs State Of U.P.
Judges: K Misra, D Sharma
08 February, 2008·F. The learned trial court failed to consider that the occurrence took place on 13-4-2001 at 9.10 p.m. and panchayatnama took place on 14-4-2001 at 7.00 a.m. which creates doubt on the prosecution story. G. The investigation officer recorded statement of P.W. 2 under Section 161 Cr.P.C. after one mo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Harikant Mishra, ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: A Kumar, S Agarwal
08 February, 2008·12. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record and the authorities cited at the Bar. 13. At the outset it would be appropriate to mention that since the University in question is governed by the Act and the statutes framed thereunder, during the course of final hearing, lea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mithlesh Kumar Son Of Sri Hari ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: S Agarwal
08 February, 2008·3. An advertisement was published on 24.12.2004 for direct recruitment against 8 vacancies of Collection Amin under Rule 5(1) of 1974 Rules. Rest of the vacancies were liable to be filled in by promotion of Collection Peons and regular appointment of Seasonal Collection Amins. On 01.07.2005 the Addi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M.S. Kapoor And Anr. vs Rajiv Gupta And Ors.
Judges: K Misra, D Sharma
08 February, 2008·It is most respectfully prayed to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the seniority lists dated 30.6.1981 and 25.9.1984, contained in Annexure No. 4 and 6 alongwith the promotion policy declared vide order dated 28.8.1984 in so far as it excludes the period of probation towards computa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satish Kumar S/O Sri Amar Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anil S/O ...
Judges: B Zaidi
08 February, 2008·2. Subsequently, the complainant came to know that S.S.I Mukesh Kumar was posted in Police Lines, Rampur, he applied before the trial court under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for summoning S.S.I. Mukesh Kumar in evidence, so that Palkati may be proved in evidence, which the trial court declined by order date...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.