Premjit Singh S/O Shri T.D. Rawal, ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh, Smt. ...
Judges: V Prasad
15 February, 2008·2. The applicant has prayed for quashing of the order dated 8.8.2007 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. refusing to direct registration of FIR and investigation of the offence. 2. At the time of admission, learned AGA contended that notice be issued to respond...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Paras Nath Son Of Raj Nath vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: A Bhushan
15 February, 2008·5. Brief facts necessary for deciding the writ petitions are; respondent No. 3, Murlidhar, filed a belated objection under Section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 dated 23rd February, 2001 praying that by giving benefit of Section 5 of Limitation Act the names of petitioners be exp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Prasad And Ors. vs Janardan Singh And Ors.
Judges: S Charan
15 February, 2008·3. It has been argued by learned Counsel for the appellants that the plaintiff is required to prove his own case independently and no benefit can be given to the plaintiff respondent due to the laches of the defendant. That it has not been proved by the plaintiff that the property in dispute is part...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Singh, Narayan Singh Both ... vs Smt. Dhanna Bai Widow Of Late Shri ...
Judges: S Charan
15 February, 2008·2. It has been argued by learned Counsel for the appellants that it is wrong to allege that Smt. Dhanna Bai was legally wedded wife of Pancham Singh. That Smt. Dhanna Bai in her statement stated her self as wife of Sunnu. When she is alleging herself wife of Sunnu as then as to how she married with ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishun Dayal vs Commissioner, Lucknow Division ...
Judges: R Sharma
15 February, 2008·1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. It has been stated by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was a licence holder of fair price shop issued under the provisions of the order passed under Essential Commodities Act. On the basis of the complaint moved the Gram Pradhan,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neeraj Dyeing Through Its Partner ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through Shri ...
Judges: S Bala
15 February, 2008·6. The learned Counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants No. 3 and 4 having not verified the return, their prosecution is sheer misuse of the process of the Court. It was argued that there are no allegations of abetment or knowledge about submission of false return against applicants No. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dey'S Medical (U.P.) (P) Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Harkauli, S Agarwal
15 February, 2008·2. The petitioner is challenging the assessment order dt. 31st Dec, 2007 (Annex. 5 to the writ petition) passed by Jt. CIT, Range-II, Allahabad, under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for the asst. yr. 2005-06 insofar as it has fastened the liability ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anjani Kumar Verma vs Additional Labour Commissioner ...
Judges: R Sharma
14 February, 2008·4. It is submitted by the petitioner that he was wrongly challaned in so far as the age of the child determined by the Chief Medical Officer child as more than 15 years. The report of the Chief Medical Officer dated 29.10.2007 has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition. 5. In the backdrop o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devi Prasad vs Vishwa Nath Prasad (D) By L.Rs. And ...
Judges: S Charan
14 February, 2008·3. The learned Counsel for the appellants of S.A. No. 1002 of 2006, Devi Prasad v. Vishwanath Prasad, further argued that there had been litigation in between the family members since the year 1971 and the appeal was also filed against the judgment and decree of Suit No. 56 of 1971. Under these circ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Ibrahim vs Mubarak Khan And Ors.
Judges: S Charan
14 February, 2008·2. It has been argued by learned Counsel for the appellant that firstly the partition alleged to have taken place on 12.3.1973 was not the proper partition of the entire property and some of the property remained joint thereafter. He also argued that so called partition deed dated 12.3.1973 has not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.