Hakim Singh, Revenue Inspector ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Bhushan
01 September, 2006·1. The compulsory retirement of the petitioner was discriminatory in view of the fact that along with the petitioner fifteen other employees were compulsorily retired on the same date i.e. 31.12.2003 and with regard to thirteen employees the State Government itself has passed an order re- instating ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Chand And Ors. vs Mst. Atwari (D) Represented By ...
Judges: S Ambwani
01 September, 2006·3. The defendant No. 2 Jagar Nath is plaintiffs uncle. It was alleged that Shri Vishwanath, the plaintiffs father died leaving plaintiffs as their heirs and in possession of the properties as members of joint Hindu family. Defendant No. 2 claimed himself to be a 'sadhoo' and often lived outside the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shio Prasad vs Banshi Mohan Agarwal And Anr.
Judges: R Tiwari
01 September, 2006·(1) persons who have any proprietary or pecuniary interest in the subject-matter of the proceeding, and who make the statement in their character of persons so interested, or (2) persons from whom the parties to the suit have derived their interest in the subject-matter of the suit are admissions, i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sita Ram (Since Deceased) Through ... vs Shanker Lal
Judges: S Ambwani
01 September, 2006·5. The trial court held that the defendant Shanker Lal is not the adopted son of the plaintiff Sita Ram, Sita Ram is the exclusive owner of the house. It is not his ancestral property. The defendant is plaintiffs licensee. A valid notice of termination of defendant's licence was not served and thus ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basant Lal And Anr. vs Lakshmi Chand
Judges: S Mehrotra
01 September, 2006·14. The aforementioned Delay Condonation Application (shown at Sl. No. 3 above) has been filed, inter alia, praying for condoning the delay in filing the aforementioned Substitution Application (shown at Sl. No. 2 above). 15. By the order dated 18-8-2006, notices have been directed to be issued on t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Estate Of Late Smt. Sushila Devi ... vs Yogendra Nath Dutt And Ors.
Judges: S Ambwani
01 September, 2006·(iv) Whether the defendant-Caveators Sarvasri Vinod Kumar Dutt and Rajedra Kumar Dutt have any locus standi to oppose the grant of probate, they having set up title in the property bequeathed by late Smt. Sushila Devi in themselves? (v) What relief if any, to be granted in this case. 18. The plainti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs D.K. Mittal And The Presiding ...
Judges: V Saran
01 September, 2006·3. The submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the Award has been passed by the Tribunal without giving any finding of its own and thus the same is an unreasoned Award, which is liable to be quashed. 4. A perusal of the impugned Award shows that except for narrating the case and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Govil (D) Through L.Rs. vs Smt. Maqsoodan And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
01 September, 2006·9. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner preferred Rent Control Appeal No. 14 of 1986 under Section 22 of the Act which was allowed vide judgment and order dated 11.2.1988, setting aside the order of eviction passed by the Prescribed Authority. 10. Against the order in appeal, aforesaid, the landla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Munari (D) Through L.Rs. vs Smt. Sumanta And Anr.
Judges: P Srivastava
01 September, 2006·3. The dispute between the petitioner and contesting respondent revolves round a gift deed in respect of Khata No. 127 which was executed by Smt. Lal Dei. She had 1/3 share in the aforesaid khata. She died in the year 1974 leaving behind three daughters namely Smt. Munari, Smt. Sumanta and Smt. Sama...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramkali W/O Jagmal, Babu Ram S/O ... vs State Of U.P. Through Collector ...
Judges: T Agarwala
01 September, 2006·5. The question for consideration is, whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, a succession certificate was necessary in an execution proceeding for the release of the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act. Section 214 of the India Succession Act reads as under: 214....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.