Battu Lal vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: S Singh
04 September, 2006·2. Challenge in this petition is to the order passed by the appellate authority dated 10.8.2006 by which appeal filed by the petitioner against the cancellation of the fair price shop licence was admitted but prayer for grant of stay has been rejected. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parul Gupta @ Amish Gupta S/O Late ... vs The District Judge And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
04 September, 2006·3. Aggrieved by order dated 17.7.1992, the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 filed Rent Appeal No. 170 of 1992 which was also dismissed vide judgement dated 16.8.1993. 4. Aggrieved against the aforesaid judgment, respondent Nos. 3 to 5 tiled Civil Misc. Writ No. 30643 of 1993 which was also dismissed by this C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Mohammad (D) Through L.Rs. vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: P Srivastava
04 September, 2006·2. The orders dated 6.2.1974, 18.6.1974 and 18.2.1975, passed by respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively are impugned in the instant writ petition. The respondent Nos. 1 and 3 concluded that an area 1 bigha, 14 biswa belongs to the contesting respondents. The S.O.C. while confirming the order of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cwt (Central) vs Sadiram Ganga Prasad (Huf)
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
04 September, 2006·The assessee, an HUF, owns a building, which was occupied by the assessee for its own residential purposes. The value of that property was to be determined in accordance with rule 1BB of the Wealth Tax Rules. The question that arose was as to what should be the 'gross maintainable rent'. The content...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mullu Son Of Kaliya vs Deputy Director (Consolidation) ...
Judges: P Srivastava
04 September, 2006·3. The disputed Khata No. 136 was initially in the name of the petitioner-Mullu, Ramkishan and respondent No. 3 Bhagwandin, respondent No. 4 Swamidin and respondent No. 5 Murliya. The share of contesting respondents was 1/2 and remaining 1/2 share belonged to the petitioner Lallu and Ramkishan, who ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hirdaya Lal vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: D Gupta
04 September, 2006·2. A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. It has been mentioned that the petitioner unauthorisedly remained absent from 1.7.1990 to 11.10.1993 but no order has been brought on record to show what action was taken by the Nagar Mahapalika in respect of the services of the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Bharthi Son Of Late Sri ... vs Deputy Director Consolidation ...
Judges: P Srivastava
01 September, 2006·2. No counter affidavit has been filed in this writ petition 3. Counsel for the respondents states that since the matter involved is a legal question that is to be decided in the instant writ petition. He does not intend to file any counter affidavit. The writ petition is being heard finally. 4. Con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manish Rai Son Of Daya Shankar Rai ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Deepak
01 September, 2006·3. The applicants have filed the copies of the FIR (Annexure-1), injury reports of the injured (Annexure-2 to 8), note of the Investigating Officer (Annexure-9), Inspection Note (Annexure-10), statement of injured Subhash (Annexure-11), discharge slip of Manish Rai (Annexure-12), Application to the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Unitech Mechines Limited Through ... vs The Presiding Officer, ...
Judges: V Saran
01 September, 2006·3. The brief facts of this case are that on charges of misconduct, the services of Respondents No. 4 to 7 (workmen) were terminated vide orders dated 1.12.1993 passed by the employer (petitioner). A dispute was raised by the workmen, which was referred by the State Government under Section 4-K of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Anjali Awasthi vs Mohd. Shafique
Judges: P Krishna
01 September, 2006·(2) Whether the finding recorded by the court below on point No. 1 that the monthly rate of rent is Rs. 500 besides Rs. 90 towards the tax is perverse and/or based on the relevant material on record? 7. At the very outset it may be stated here that no other point was pressed by the learned Counsel f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.