Association Of Teachers And Other ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: S Srivastava
05 September, 2006·2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing counsel. 3. The allegations made in the complaint are as regard to irregularities allegedly committed by Management. The order passed by Regional Joint Director of Education rejecting the complaint with the observation that it is not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Kumar Yadav, Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: D Gupta
05 September, 2006·8. The Supreme Court inCommissioner of Public Instructions and Ors. v. K.R. Vishwanath 2005 AIR SCW 4102, dealt at length with the object regarding compassionate ground and observed: As was observed in State of Haryana and Ors. v. Rani Devi and Anr. , it need not be pointed out that the claim of per...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs Sadiram Ganga Prasad (Huf)
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
04 September, 2006·The assessee, an HUF, owns a building, which was occupied by the assessee for its own residential purposes. The value of that property was to be determined in accordance with Rule 1BB of the WT Rules. The question that arose was as to what should be the 'gross maintainable rent'. The contention of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Anis Fatima vs Jagdish Singh And Ors.
Judges: P Srivastava
04 September, 2006·3. It is evident that the writ petition is against a decision on the preliminary issue in the suit filed by the appellant at Meerut. The Court has already recorded its finding on merits and declined to exercise jurisdiction. This finding was confirmed in appeal, I come to a conclusion that the writ ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Mangal (D.) Through L.Rs. vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: P Srivastava
04 September, 2006·1. Heard Smt. Durga Tiwari, earned Counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the contesting respondents. 2. The order dated 19.10.1985 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Deoria is impugned in the instant writ petition. The dispute relates to Plot No. 941 having an area 25 decimal only,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uttar Pradesh Upbhokta Sahkari ... vs Vijay Shanker Rai Son Of Shri Anant ...
Judges: S R Alam, S Agarwal
04 September, 2006·4. Shri H.R. Mishra, learned Counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that subsequently the approval of the Board was obtained and, therefore, if there was any defect, the same stands rectified but the Hon'ble Single Judge has not addressed to this aspect and thus, fell in error. We do not fin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bishwa Nath Prasad Verma vs Jagdish Narain Srivastava (D) ...
Judges: P Srivastava
04 September, 2006·6. Sri U.N. Sharma has disputed the arguments of Sri Bhagwati Prasad Singh. He has submitted that N.T.P.C. is a Government company and the common assumption that a corporate body pays higher rent cannot be accepted. The assertion of the earned Counsel for the revisionist to the contrary is farfetche...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Kumar Srivastava Son Of ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
04 September, 2006·(iii) Ashok alias Somanna Gowda and Anr. v. State of Karnataka. . 7. On the other hand the learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the State Government has submitted that after the expiry of the life of the waiting list nothing further could be done and no appointment can be made thereafter. He has re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B.P.L. Display Devices Workers ... vs Deputy Labour Commissioner And ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
04 September, 2006·12. In view of the provisions of Sub-section (3) of Section 10 of the Standing Orders Act, 1946, the submission proceeds, an appeal may be filed under Section 6 of the said Act against the impugned order. 13. Sri C.B. Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2 has placed reliance on a decision ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagat Narain Nigam vs Suraj Prasad Srivastava
Judges: R Tiwari
04 September, 2006·5. The Prescribed Authority granted the release application vide order dated 2.8.2004, holding that the need of the landlord was genuine and comparative hardship of the landlord was greater than the tenant. 6. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner filed appeal before the District Judge, w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.