Sayed Mohammad Mahfooj Son Of Shri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: S R Alam, S Agarwal
10 October, 2006·(1) the provisions contained in these rules prevail to the extent of the inconsistency in case the specific rules were made prior to the commencement of these rules; and (2)the provisions contained in the specific rules shall prevail in case they are made after the commencement of these rules. 11. R...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
J.U. Pesticides And Chemicals ... vs Commissioner, Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
10 October, 2006·6. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, I have perused the order of the Tribunal and the authorities below. Record of the case has also been produced during the course of hearing, which has been perused. 7. In the present case, there is no dispute that the goods were coming from Kamrup,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bindal Logistic Pvt. Ltd. vs Ashok Handloom Factory And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
10 October, 2006·1. Heard the learned Counsel for the revisionist. 2. This revision challenges the order of the court below dated 29.8.2006 whereby petitioner's prayer for dismissing the suit under Order VII, Rule 11. C.P.C. and Section 15 read with Schedule II Article 4 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ex. Const. C.P. No. 138 Ramesh ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: B Sapru
10 October, 2006·3. The petitioner filed an appeal, which was also dismissed on 31.3.1995. Against the appellate order, the petitioner filed a revision though belatedly and therefore the revision was dismissed as time barred on 31.3.1996 by the I.G. without going into the matter of merits. 4. The petitioner has come...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul Trading Company Through Its ... vs The Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
10 October, 2006·3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 4. Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the entire books of account were produced before the Assessing Authority, which is referred in the assessment orders itself. He submitted the only ground taken by the Assessing Authority was. that the appli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Ram Singh Son Of Sri Hemraj ... vs Ist Additional Distt. Judge And ...
Judges: S Khan
09 October, 2006·3. Respondent No. 2 Sardara filed Original Suit No. 372 of 1978 against the petitioners. Petitioners had purchased the agricultural land in dispute (Khasra No. 44 area 5 bigha 2 biswa and 5 biswansis) from Prabhu, real brother of plaintiff Sardara. Sale deed was executed on 2.3.1963 and registered o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Prasad, Lal Babu Both Sons Of ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And ...
Judges: B A Zaidi
09 October, 2006·4. The prayer has not been properly worded, because there is no mention in the prayer that the Magistrate should release the accused on bail, and the only mention is that the accused, should be released. The whole prayer has, therefore, become confused. 5. However, on the basis of the argument advan...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Sharan Agarwal, Building ... vs Commissioner, Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
09 October, 2006·7. I do not find any substance in (he argument of learned Counsel for the applicant The submission of learned Counsel for the applicant that the works contract executed by the applicant was not covered under 15 works contract mentioned in the Notification dated 27 4.1987. therefore. Boulders supplie...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girish Narain Chaudhari vs Rojai And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
09 October, 2006·3. Appellant's suit for permanent injunction was dismissed and the counter-claim of the respondents defendants was decreed by the trial court directing the plaintiff to remove his wall and channel gate falling in the disputed land. The plaintiff had filed the suit claiming the land in question as hi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari ... vs Commissioner Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
09 October, 2006·(C) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Trade Tax Tribunal was legally justified in determining the turnover of "Flavoured Milk" and imposing tax thereon when the Flavoured Milk is basically milk and is exempted from tax as per Notification No. ST-11 7038/X/dated 31.01.198...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.