Mohammad Haneef S/O Mohammad Umar ... vs The State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, R Deepak, K Misra
13 October, 2006·8. On appraisal of evidence, the trial judge held the accused appellant to be guilty under Section 302 I.P.C. for committing the murder of Ghasitey and sentenced him to life imprisonment. 9. We have heard Sri Mahendra Pratap, learned Counsel for the accused appellant and Sri M.C. Joshi, learned A.G....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S.P. Builders, Through Its ... vs Chairperson, Debts Recovery ...
Judges: S Agarwal
13 October, 2006·& (vii) Whether the defendants are entitled to the amount and the relief claimed in the counter claim? - Decided against the petitioner and in favour of the bank. (viii) To what relief if any, the applicant bank is entitled to get from the defendants? - Decided against the bank on the ground that si...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Narain Jaiswal Son Of Brij ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Rastogi
13 October, 2006·The position is thus clear. Any judicial Magistrate , before taking cognizance of the offence, can order investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code. If he does so, he is not to examine the complainant on oath because he was not taking cognizance of any offence therein. For the purpose of enablin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogesh Kumar Gaur Son Of Late Sri ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: A Tandon
13 October, 2006·8. That in the ad-hoc vacancy created in the L.T. Grade (corresponding to the previous C.T. Grade) due to the ad-hoc promotion of Sri Ram Achal Yadav, referred to above, which was also remained vacant for more than two months after notification of the above vacancy to the Commission through the Dist...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajeev Kumar Agarwal, Son Of Shri ... vs V.K. Metal Works (Buffer ...
Judges: T Agarwala
13 October, 2006·3. Heard Sri J.J. Munir, the. learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Agarwal, the learned Counsel for the respondents. 4. The Supreme Court in Sangram Singh's case (supra) while interpreting the provisions of Order 17 Rules 1 and 2 of the C.P.C. read with Order 9 Rule 6(1)(a) held that if a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pintoo Son Of Kalu And Prem Pal Son ... vs State Of U.P. And Sri Ramesh Chand ...
Judges: K Ojha
13 October, 2006·4. It has been submitted by learned Counsel for the revisionist that when as many as six witnesses have been examined and the case is at the last stage, it was not proper stage to exercise power under Section 319 Cr.PC. In respect of this contention 2000(40) ACC 795 Michael Michado v. Central Bureau...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Smt. Munia Devi Jain
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
12 October, 2006·(vii) Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hindustan Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. ; (viii) Commissioner of Income Tax v. Govind Prasad Prabhu Nath ; (ix) Commissioner of Income Tax v. S. Avtar Singh Sandhu ; (x) P. Mariyappa Gounder v. Commissioner of Income Tax ; (xi) Foramer France v. Commissi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fahimur Rahman Siddiqui Son Of Sri ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: A Yog, R Rastogi
12 October, 2006·2. In view of our judgment and order dated 26.9.2006 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 54400 of 2006 Smt. Omitri Rai v. General Manager and Anr. we find that this case does not stand on better footing, since the petitioner admittedly submitted an affidavit in the prescribed proforma and the om...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Reena Jain vs Cit
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
12 October, 2006·All the appellants received gift from one person, namely, Sri Mohd. Shamim Khan, son of Late Sri Hamid Ullah Khan, R/o 3/547, Khan Alampura, Saharanpur (U.P.). It was claimed that Mohd. Shamim Khan was holding NRI status and the gifts were given out of his NRI account. It was claimed that Sri Mohd. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nar Singh Das Agrawal Son Of Late ... vs Chief Controlling Revenue ...
Judges: S Khan
12 October, 2006·2. Alongwith report of Tehsildar map was also annexed showing that on three sides of the house in dispute there were residential houses. Merely because house was situate at Maalgodam road it could not be inferred that it was commercial. Houses also require roads. The mere fact that a house is adjace...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.