Bimal Kumar Anant Kumar vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
09 October, 2006·5. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the Income Tax Officer without pointing out any defect in the account books or in the method of accounting, had proceeded to determine the income by best judgment, which is not permissible under law. According to him, the books of account has b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Export Metals Through Its ... vs U.P. Financial Corporation ...
Judges: R Misra, S Kumar
09 October, 2006·(B) Any the relief to which the plaintiff may be found entitled may also be given. (C) Cost of the suit be also awarded to the plaintiff from the defendants. 5. An injunction application was filed and the same was granted in favour of the petitioner. The written statement was filed taking a plea tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Samsussalam Quddusi Son Of ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: R Misra, S Kumar
09 October, 2006·4. Treating the show cause notice as notice under Section 81 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipality Act 1916 the respondent has directed the recovery of the amount from the petitioner as arrears of land revenue. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that treating it as tax a recovery certific...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dewan Resins Private Limited ... vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
09 October, 2006·3. Heard Sri Piyush Agrawal, learned Counsel for- the applicant and Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel. 4. In the present case, dispute relates to the rejection of stock transfer of 17 drums, which were claimed to be stock transfer to the Delhi depot but had been treated as inter-State sales....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Prakash vs Smt. Chander Kanta And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
09 October, 2006·7. He submits that the appellate court has held that the accommodation in dispute is in dilapidated condition but has not even considered that whether the respondent-landlords fulfilled the mandatory requirement of Rule 17 of the Act. 8. In this regard the Prescribed Authority has given clear findin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hero Cycles Limited, Unit Ii, ... vs The Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
09 October, 2006·10. Notification No. TT-2-3403/XI-9(116)/94-U.P. Act-15/48-Order-94, dated 1.10.1994: any activity or experience that gives enjoyment or recreation, pastime, diversion, such an activity requiring more or less vigorous bodily exertion and carried on according to some traditional form or set of rules ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pujari Yadav Son Of Shri Sovambar vs Ram Briksh Yadav Son Of Shri Babu ...
Judges: Y Singh, R V Singh
09 October, 2006·(ii) Whether the prior approval of DIOS was necessary before terminating the services of the plaintiff-appellant? (iii) Whether on the finding recorded by the first appellate court, the plaintiff is entitled to any relief? (iv) Whether any relief can be granted to plaintiff-appellant in absence of C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari ... vs Commissioner, Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
09 October, 2006·(B) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Trade Tax Tribunal was legally justified in determining the turnover of different goods without assigning any basis for determination thereof ? (C) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Trade Tax Tribunal was...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management Kisan ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: V Saran
09 October, 2006·2. I have heard Sri Shashi Nandan, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Namit Srivastava for the petitioners; learned standing counsel appearing for respondent No. 1; Sri B. D. Pandey, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 2-University; as well as Sri Ashok Khare, learned senior counsel, as...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay vs Upper Zila Adhikari And Anr.
Judges: R Tiwari
06 October, 2006·3. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the report of Rent Control Inspector had been submitted behind the back of the petitioner affecting his valuable rights. It is also submitted that in view of Section 3(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.