Allah Rakha Son Of Hansi Mohd. vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
18 May, 2006·2. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the petitioner, who is a member of the Zila Panchayat, Farrukhabad be provided security in pursuance of the direction of this Court in an earlier writ petition bearing No. 8563 of 2006 (Allah Rakha v. State of U.P. and Ors.) decided by a divisi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunath Prasad Yadav S/O Raj ... vs District Inspector Of Schools, ...
Judges: A N Ray, A Bhushan
18 May, 2006·5. Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that the requirement of period sixty days as mentioned in Section 18 is mandatory. He further submitted that the appointment of the appellant as an ad hoc Assistant Teacher L.T. Grade was void ab-initio and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Lal Son Of Shri Ganga ... vs Vith Addl. District Judge, Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
18 May, 2006·3. It was alleged in the plaint that tenant-petitioner - Shankar Lal had sublet one of two shops or one of the two portions of the shop to Suraj Pal. It is strange that Suraj Pal the alleged subtenant appeared as witness of the landlord and alleged that for a short period in between 1978-79 Shankar ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhurey Son Of Shri Ram Prakash ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: G Srivastava
18 May, 2006·2. According to the prosecution case on 11.1.06 at about 8.00 P.M. the applicant along with co-accused Indrapal Singh, Satya Veer Singh and Sukh Veer Singh all armed with country made pistol except Sukh Veer Singh who was armed with licenced gun came to the door of the informant abused him and his s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Anjana Kumar W/O Sri Ajai ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: T Agarwala
18 May, 2006·5. The appointments of teachers in a minority institution are governed by the provisions of Section 16FF of the Intermediate Education Act readwith Regulation 20 of the Chapter II of the Regulations framed under the said Act. Section 16 FF of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 reads as under:...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Prakash Agrawal Son Of Shri ... vs Cantonment Executive Officer, ...
Judges: M Jain, K Misra
18 May, 2006·5. Since the Hon'ble Single Judge was prima facie satisfied that a case of wilful contempt was made out against the appellant/contemnor Anand Prakash Agarwal, he required him to appear in person before the Court for framing of charge(s). 6. We have heard Sri P.K. Jain, learned Counsel for the appell...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bal Kishan Bansal Son Of ... vs Pramit Bansal Son Of Devki Nandan ...
Judges: P Krishna
18 May, 2006·(1) Close reading of Sub-section (1) of section 8 clearly shows that it has been couched in a mandatory form as it has used word 'shall'. It envisages that judicial authority before whom the matter is pending which is subject of an Arbitration Agreement shall refer the dispute to arbitration, if a p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Betawa River Board Through Its ... vs Gauri Shanker Chaturvedi S/O Late ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
18 May, 2006·12. The next document which is worth noting is the Junior High School Certificate issued by the District Inspector of Schools in respect of the respondent. It is relevant to point out that the Junior High School examinations which were held earlier were conducted by the Board and the certificate was...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rameshwar S/O Sri Kanhai Lal vs The State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, K Misra
18 May, 2006·6. The defence was of denial. The accused appellant stated under Section 313 Cr.P.C. that he had been implicated falsely owing to enmity. He had gone to the fair price shop of Ram Kishore to purchase two litres of kerosene. He was offering control price but Ram Kishore was asking for Rs. 25/- per li...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Veerpal Singh S/O Shri Bishun Lal vs Senior Superintendent Of Police ...
Judges: S Agarwal
18 May, 2006·16th August 1996- Charge sheet issued to the petitioner containing sole charge of bigamy and violation of the conduct Rules. 21st August 1996- Petitioner replied the charge sheet denying allegations made against him and requesting to drop the entire proceedings at this very stage. 10. The evidence, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.