Shri Shri Krishna Singh Son Of Sri ... vs U.P. Public Services Tribunal I ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Misra
23 May, 2006·There can be no doubt in this case that the enquiry was not conducted in the manner required by the Standing Orders of the appellant. Even though Akhileshwar Prasad had withdrawn from the enquiry whether rightly or wrongly the enquiry should have been completed and all evidence should have been take...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Kumar Sharma vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: S Shanker
23 May, 2006·4. Feeling aggrieved by it the accused Rajendra preferred the present revision in this Court. 5. Heard the arguments of learned Counsel for both the parties and perused the record. 6. It is contended on behalf of the revisionist that second sample of the revisionist was not sent to Center Food Labor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Briksha Prasad Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Special ...
Judges: V Sahai, S Yadav
23 May, 2006·Minor Penalties: (i) Censure: (ii) Withholding of increments for a specified period; (iii) Stoppage at an efficiency bar; (iv) Recovery from pay of the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused to Government by negligence or breach or orders; (v) Fine in case of persons holding Group 'D' posts; Pro...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Chandra vs Xvth Additional District Judge ...
Judges: R Sharma
23 May, 2006·4. A written statement was filed indicating therein that the rent was offered to the landlord and on his refusal to accept it. the same was deposited under Section 30(1) of the Act. The rent was sent by money-order also. The petitioner has relied on the decision of this Court as in Pasupati Singh v....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Das And Anr. vs Rent Control And Eviction ...
Judges: S Khan
23 May, 2006·4. The main argument of landlady before R.C. & E.O. was that Mahavir Saran the tenant had inducted Dharmendra and Shital Prasad as partner in the firm which carried out the business from the shop in dispute and as they were not family members of Mahavir Saran hence there was vacancy in terms of Sect...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alka Wife Of Narendra Singh Yadav vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: V Saran
23 May, 2006·(2) Subject to the superintendence, direction and control of the State Election Commission the Mukhya Nirvachan Adhikari (Panchayat) shall supervise and perform all functions relating to the conduct of the election of the office of Pradhan, Up-Pradhan or a member of a Gram Panchayat in the State. (3...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Adhunik Food Products (Pvt.) Ltd. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Misra
23 May, 2006·D. to issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. E. to award the costs of the petition to the petitioner. 2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are as follows: 3. According to the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Alka Rai W/O Late Krishna Nand ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shankar
23 May, 2006·20. NCR/9/97, under Section 506 I.P.C., Police Station Saidpur, District Ghazipur. 21. Case Crime No. 52/98, under Section 3 N.S.A. Act, Police Station Bhelupur, District Varanasi. 22. Case Crime No. 37/99, under Section 3 N.S.A. Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Ghazipur. 23. Case Crime No. 17/...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shishu Pal Singh S/O Late Sri Roop ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: T Agarwala
23 May, 2006·2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for the quashing of the orders dated 9.3.2006 and 11.3.2006 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, whereby he has approved the suspension order dated 27.2.2005. 3. Dr. Daya Shanker, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted, that the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munni Ram S/O Sri Nirohi Ram vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Sahi
23 May, 2006·3. Sri Kripa Shanker Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner has relied on the Govt. Order dated 2.12.2000 and the order dated 27.9.2001 wherein it was clearly provided that in case the respondent forgoes his promotion, his future claim for promotion shall not be considered. 4. Respondent Nanhey L...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.