Lajja Ram Lalam (Since Deceased) ... vs Kanhai Chandra And Ors.
Judges: S Ambwani
26 May, 2006·5. The plaintiff filed a Small Cause Court Suit No. 55 of 1968 for recovery of rent. In this suit the parties entered into a compromise on 14.3.1969, the terms of which were as follows : (A) The plaintiffs and the defendants were co-sharer of the building in which police out post exists and each of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vidya Prakash Pandey Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Ministry Of ...
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
26 May, 2006·4. The investigating officer, Ram Nagina Singh, who is posted as inspector Kotwali Hata, District Kushinagar, appeared in court on 18.5.2006 and 19.5.2006. Thereafter he failed to appear on 22.5.06 and 25.5.06 inspite of our orders as he claimed to be ill. His counter affidavit mentions that he agre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mirza Qazim Raza Beg And Ors. vs Ivth A.D.J. And Anr.
Judges: S Khan
26 May, 2006·4. Aforesaid suit for eviction was decreed by J.S.C.C. on 16.11.1973. Revision filed against the same was also dismissed. Thereafter execution application being Execution Case No. 257 of 1975 was filed for execution of decree for eviction. In the year 1975, Smt. Nazeer Fatima and one of her sister S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ranjit Singh And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: S Shanker
26 May, 2006·5. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the impugned judgement and order passed by the revisional court is beyond the scope of revision. It was directed against the order dated 12.7.2004 passed by the Executive Magistrate wherein a finding has been recorded by the Magistrate that the ci...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Govind Prasad Singh Son Of Shri Raj ... vs U.P. State Public Services ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Misra
26 May, 2006·3. From a perusal of above it is seen that para 1 (6) contemplates that departmental action can be taken only after final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been accepted by the District Magistrate. It is contended that mandatory provision of para 1 has to be complied with otherwise any department...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bachan Singh @ Ramesh Singh Son Of ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
26 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Surendra Tiwari learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant; I. That there is no credible evidence collected by the I.O. during investigation and the applicant has been falsely implicated only on the basis of doubt...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangroo S/O Sarjuand Ors. vs Ram Sumer Son Of Ram Samujh And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
26 May, 2006·3. After start of consolidation proceedings Ram Sumer respondent No. 1 son of Ram Samujh filed objections claiming exclusive right in the property in dispute. He asserted that in 1331 fasli status of his father was wrongly shown as Farari (abandonment) and the names of Parag, Jhakari and Bali Karan ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Omvir S/O Bhihari (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
25 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Ram Babu Sharma learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the state of U.P. and Sri Sanjay Srivastava learned Counsel for the complainant. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant that: (i) The first informant is not an eye witness. He has lodged the F....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kiran Sharma Wife Of Naresh ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
25 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Dileep Kurnar and Sri Rajeev Gupta learned Counsel for the applicant, Sri Lal Vijay Singh learned A.G.A. for the state of U.P. and Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ajat Shatru Pandey learned Counsel for the complainant. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Qadir S/O Jalaluddin vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
25 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Sahab Tiwari, learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the revisionist that the impugned orders are illegal because neither the order of the Juvenile Justice Board nor the order of the appellate court shows that there was any m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.