Irshad Son Of Sareef Kuraishi (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·3. Heard Sri Satyendra Narain Singh learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 4. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant: I. That the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. The dead body of the deceased was recovered from the sugar cane field and there is no direct eyew...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shahnaz vs Judge Small Causes Court And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
04 May, 2006·2. The brief facts are that the respondent-landlord filed suit in question being Suit No. 117 of 2000, Waqf Masjid v. Smt. Shahnaz, on the ground that defendant-petitioner is the tenant at the rate of Rs. 8 of House No. 38/41, Mohalla Katla, Meerut City and the plaintiff-respondent is the owner and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bechu Pandey Son Of Vijay Pandey ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
04 May, 2006·I. That the first informant is the father of the deceased. He was not the eye witness of the occurrence, even in the F.I.R. the manner in which the deceased was murdered has not been given, even it has not been alleged that the deceased was murdered. II. That according to the F.I.R. the manner of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahim Patram Private Ltd. Through ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: S Harkauli, V Nath
03 May, 2006·9. In the circumstances, normally, it would be for the Assessing Authority, upon the material furnished by the assessee as also such other material which may be relevant, to determine the 'sale price' of the goods, which were transferred under the work contract. 10. In the case of Gannon Dunkerley a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakas Asati S/O Mr. Devi Das vs State Of Uttar Pradesh (By And ...
Judges: V Sahai, B Zaidi
03 May, 2006·(i) An order of compulsory retirement is not a punishment. It implies no stigma nor any suggestion of misbehaviour. (ii) The order has to be passed by the government on forming the opinion that it is in the public interest to retire a government servant compulsory. The order is passed on the subject...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Kiran Shanker Son Of Late Dr. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: R Agrawal, S Misra
03 May, 2006·(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record of the case and quashing the order impugned dated 31.3.2006 passed by the respondent - Committee of Management of the College and the resolution of the Committee of Management dated 31.3.2006 (Annexures - 2 an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devanand S/O Shri Matadeen Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Engineer In ...
Judges: R Kumar
03 May, 2006·4. Heard Sri B. Ram, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has worked for more than 240 days from 6.8.1986 to 26.6.1988 in a year and again worked from 23.6.1996 to 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jhuri And Ors. vs Aldan William
Judges: B A Zaidi
03 May, 2006·2. The defendant-respondent Aldan William, thereafter filed a suit No. 1468 of 2000 for setting aside the compromise decree dated 18.5.1989, obtained on the ground of fraud and allegation was that the defendants Jhuri and Ors. manipulated the filing of the written statement in Suit No. 584 of 1989 b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Shyam Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Kant
03 May, 2006·3. I may put on record that in the meantime, the petitioner, through his wife, again sent telegrams and lastly a telegram, which is on record, has been received in the High Court on 24.4.06 saying that in the absence of final hearing in the present writ petition, despite efforts being made, the appl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Laxmi Devi Wife Of Kunwar Pal vs Kunwar Pal S/O Hardev
Judges: A Zaidi
03 May, 2006·3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondent. 4. The Rule about jurisdiction as contained in Section 9(1) of the 'Act' and which is relevant here, is as follows: 9(i) Court having jurisdiction to entertain application: (1) If the application is wit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.